AWS Amplify vs Backendless: Which is Better in 2026?
Choosing between AWS Amplify and Backendless comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.
Bottom line: AWS Amplify wins this matchup. OutSystems is our overall Low-Code Backend pick. Sanity is our free Low-Code Backend pick. Pick Backendless if you need a free tier to start with.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:
AWS Amplify
Build and deploy full-stack web & mobile apps on AWS
Best for you if:
- • You want aWS integration
- • You want full-stack support
Backendless
Backend as a service with visual app development
Best for you if:
- • You want codeless backend
- • You want visual development
| At a Glance | AWS Amplify | Backendless |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | FreeFree tier available | FreeFree tier available |
Best For | Low-Code Backend | Low-Code Backend |
Rating | 4.2/5 | 4.4/5 |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Choose AWS Amplify or Backendless?
Choose AWS Amplify if
Build and deploy full-stack web & mobile apps on AWS
- You want aWS integration
- You want full-stack support
Choose Backendless if
Backend as a service with visual app development
- You want codeless backend
- You want visual development
| Feature | AWS Amplify | Backendless |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| User Rating | ★4.2/5 100 reviews | ★4.4/5 56 reviews |
| Categories | Low-Code BackendHosting & Deployment | Low-Code BackendApp Builders |
In-Depth Analysis
AWS Amplify
Build and deploy full-stack web & mobile apps on AWS
AWS Amplify is cost-effective for small to medium apps.
Strengths
- +AWS integration
- +Full-stack support
- +Good hosting
Weaknesses
- -AWS complexity
- -Vendor lock-in
Key features
Backendless
Backend as a service with visual app development
The pricing structure is incredibly generous, offering both a fully functional free cloud tier and a self-hosted 'Pro' tier for $0.
Strengths
- +Codeless backend
- +Visual development
- +Real-time database
- +Good for prototypes
- +Fair pricing
Weaknesses
- -Vendor lock-in
- -Learning curve
- -Limited customization
- -Performance varies
- -Documentation gaps
Key features
Pricing: AWS Amplify vs Backendless
| Plan | AWS Amplify | Backendless |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Free Free Tier | Free Free |
| Tier 2 | $0.023 /GB storage Hosting | Free Pro |
| Tier 3 | $0.01 /minute Build | custom Managed |
| Tier 4 | $0.3 /1M requests SSR | N/A |
Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on AWS Amplify pricing and Backendless pricing.
Who Should Use What?
On a budget?
Both are freemium. Compare plans on their websites.
Go with: AWS Amplify
Want the highest-rated option?
AWS Amplify: 4.2/5 (100 reviews). Backendless: 4.4/5 (56 reviews).
Go with: Backendless
Value user reviews?
AWS Amplify: 100 reviews (4.2/5). Backendless: 56 reviews (4.4/5).
Go with: AWS Amplify
3 Questions to Help You Decide
What's your budget?
Both are freemium. Pricing won't help you decide here.
What's your use case?
Both are low-code backend tools. Compare their specific features to decide.
How important are ratings?
Backendless is rated higher: 4.4/5 vs 4.2/5.
Key Takeaways
AWS Amplify
- Larger review base (100 reviews)
- Free tier available
- Our pick for this comparison
Backendless
- Higher user rating: 4.4/5 vs 4.2/5
The Bottom Line
AWS Amplify wins this matchup. OutSystems is our overall Low-Code Backend pick. Sanity is our free Low-Code Backend pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AWS Amplify or Backendless better?
AWS Amplify is rated in our evaluation. Both are freemium.
What are AWS Amplify and Backendless used for?
AWS Amplify: Build and deploy full-stack web & mobile apps on AWS. Backendless: Backend as a service with visual app development.
What does AWS Amplify cost vs Backendless?
AWS Amplify is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Backendless is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.