Azure Functions vs Google Cloud Functions: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Google Cloud Functions leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Azure Functions
Serverless compute for event-driven applications on Azure
Best for you if:
- • You want serverless functions
Google Cloud Functions
Serverless compute on Google Cloud
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Azure Functions | Google Cloud Functions |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Not published | Free plan |
Category | Hosting & Deployment Serverless | Hosting & Deployment Serverless |
Rating | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 214 reviews | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 81 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | Storage for function code/logs | n/a |
Choose Azure Functions or Google Cloud Functions?
Choose Azure Functions if
- You want serverless functions
- You want multiple language support
Choose Google Cloud Functions if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want serverless functions
- You want good for event-driven
In-Depth Analysis
Azure Functions
Serverless compute for event-driven applications on Azure
Azure Functions offers a very generous Free Tier with 1M executions and 400,000 GB-seconds, making it highly accessible for small projects.
Watch out
Storage for function code/logs
Strengths
- Pro: Serverless functions
- Pro: Multiple language support
- Pro: Good Azure integration
- Pro: Consumption-based pricing
- Pro: Durable functions
Weaknesses
- Con: Cold starts
- Con: Vendor lock-in
- Con: Debugging complex
- Con: Execution limits
- Con: Local development tricky
Key features
Google Cloud Functions
Serverless compute on Google Cloud
Google Cloud Functions' pricing is very generous, especially with its substantial free tier covering 2 million invocations and significant compute resources.
Strengths
- Pro: Serverless functions
- Pro: Good for event-driven
- Pro: Pay per invocation
- Pro: Easy deployment
- Pro: Good logging
Weaknesses
- Con: Cold starts
- Con: Execution limits
- Con: Less features than Lambda
- Con: Vendor lock-in
- Con: Debugging limited
Key features
Plans and prices: Azure Functions vs Google Cloud Functions
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Azure Functions |
| azure.microsoft.com/products/functions read Oct 3, 2026 |
| Google Cloud Functions |
| cloud.google.com/functions/pricing read Oct 13, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Azure Functions pricing and Google Cloud Functions pricing.
Key Takeaways
Azure Functions
- Choose if you want serverless compute for event-driven applications on Azure
Google Cloud Functions
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Google Cloud Functions leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.4/5 from 214 reviews for Azure Functions, 4.4/5 from 81 reviews for Google Cloud Functions).
- Only Google Cloud Functions has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions compare in 2026?
On the data below, Google Cloud Functions leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.4/5 from 214 reviews for Azure Functions, 4.4/5 from 81 reviews for Google Cloud Functions). Only Google Cloud Functions has a free plan.
What are Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions used for?
Azure Functions: Serverless compute for event-driven applications on Azure. Google Cloud Functions: Serverless compute on Google Cloud.
What does Azure Functions cost vs Google Cloud Functions?
Azure Functions has no public paid-plan price on file. Google Cloud Functions has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 13, 2026.
What's the main difference between Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions?
Azure Functions's main strength: serverless functions. Google Cloud Functions's main strength: serverless functions.