Skip to content

BoxyHQ vs Zitadel: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between BoxyHQ and Zitadel comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.

Bottom line: Zitadel is our overall pick for security workflows. Pick BoxyHQ if you need a free tier to start with.

··Methodology
Editor reviewed0 verified reviews comparedPricing checked Aug 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:

BoxyHQ

Modern, modular, and scalable Identity & Access Management for all your applications and agents.

Best for you if:

  • Provides modern and modular Identity & Access Management (IAM) for various use cases.
  • Offers flexible deployment options including open-source, self-hosted, and managed SaaS.

Zitadel

Open-source identity management

Best for you if:

  • Zitadel is an open-source identity management platform
  • It provides authentication, authorization, and user management
At a Glance
BoxyHQBoxyHQ
ZitadelZitadel
Starts at
FreeFree tier available
FreeFree tier available
Best For
SecuritySecurity
Rating
--
Free plan
Yes Yes

Choose BoxyHQ or Zitadel?

BoxyHQ

Choose BoxyHQ if

Modern, modular, and scalable Identity & Access Management for all your applications and agents.

  • Highly flexible and modular architecture allows for custom solutions.
  • Scalable to handle high volumes of API requests and users.
  • Offers various deployment options including open-source, self-hosted, and managed SaaS.
Zitadel

Choose Zitadel if

Open-source identity management

  • Open source IAM
  • Self-hostable
  • Good features
FeatureBoxyHQZitadel
Pricing ModelFreemiumFreemium
User RatingNo ratings yetNo ratings yet
Categories
SecurityIdentity & Access
SecurityDeveloper Tools

In-Depth Analysis

BoxyHQBoxyHQ

Modern, modular, and scalable Identity & Access Management for all your applications and agents.

Starts at Free
Good value

BoxyHQ's pricing is quite generous for developers with a free tier offering $21 in credit and two dev environments.

Watch out

Overage fees for aDAU, M2M Tokens, Permission Checks

Strengths

  • +Highly flexible and modular architecture allows for custom solutions.
  • +Scalable to handle high volumes of API requests and users.
  • +Offers various deployment options including open-source, self-hosted, and managed SaaS.
  • +Provides granular control over permissions and access.
  • +Supports identity for diverse entities: customers, partners, machines, and employees.

Weaknesses

  • -Pricing can become complex with usage-based models for larger deployments.
  • -B2B SSO is limited to OIDC only in Growth plan, potentially requiring Enterprise for broader support.

Key features

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)B2B Identity and Access Management (IAM)Agentic AI Identity and Access ManagementWorkforce Identity and Access ManagementOpen Source Deployment optionsOry Enterprise License (OEL) for self-hosting

ZitadelZitadel

Open-source identity management

Starts at Free
Good value

Zitadel's pricing is quite generous, especially with its robust open-source offering at $0.

Watch out

Overage fees likely for MAU beyond 25K on Cloud

Strengths

  • +Open source IAM
  • +Self-hostable
  • +Good features
  • +Active development
  • +Cloud option

Weaknesses

  • -Learning curve
  • -Setup complexity
  • -Documentation improving
  • -Smaller community
  • -Still maturing

Key features

Identity managementOIDCSAMLMulti-tenantSelf-hostedOpen source

Pricing: BoxyHQ vs Zitadel

PlanBoxyHQZitadel
Tier 1
Free
Developer
N/A
Tier 2
$70 / month
Production
N/A
Tier 3
$9,350 / year
Growth
N/A
Tier 4
Contact us
Enterprise
N/A

Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on BoxyHQ pricing and Zitadel pricing.

Who Should Use What?

On a budget?

Both are freemium. Compare plans on their websites.

Go with: BoxyHQ

Want the highest-rated option?

Neither has ratings yet.

Too early to call on ratings — compare on features and pricing.

Value user reviews?

Neither has ratings yet.

Too early to call — neither has ratings yet.

3 Questions to Help You Decide

1

What's your budget?

Both are freemium. Pricing won't help you decide here.

2

What's your use case?

Both are security tools. Compare their specific features to decide.

3

How important are ratings?

Neither has ratings yet.

Key Takeaways

Zitadel

  • Free tier available
  • Our pick for this comparison

BoxyHQ

  • Choose if you want modern, modular, and scalable Identity & Access Management for all your applications and agents

The Bottom Line

Zitadel is our pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is BoxyHQ or Zitadel better?

Zitadel is rated in our evaluation. Both are freemium.

What are BoxyHQ and Zitadel used for?

BoxyHQ: Modern, modular, and scalable Identity & Access Management for all your applications and agents.. Zitadel: Open-source identity management.

What does BoxyHQ cost vs Zitadel?

BoxyHQ is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Zitadel is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools