Cartegraph vs CityWorks: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Cartegraph and CityWorks side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Cartegraph
Manage and optimize public infrastructure assets with integrated government solutions.
Best for you if:
- • You want tailored specifically for government and public sector needs
CityWorks
GIS-centric asset lifecycle management for public infrastructure and community development.
Best for you if:
- • You want leverages existing GIS data for improved operational efficiency
| At a Glance | Cartegraph | CityWorks |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Not published | Not published |
Category | Government & Public Sector Project Management | Government & Public Sector Workflow Automation |
Rating | 4.3/5 SourceForge 4.3 · G2 4.4 88 reviews | 4.2/5 SourceForge 4.3 · Capterra 4.4 · G2 3.9 108 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Choose Cartegraph or CityWorks?
Choose Cartegraph if
- You want tailored specifically for government and public sector needs
- You want integrated with a broader government operations platform (OpenGov Cloud)
Choose CityWorks if
- You want leverages existing GIS data for improved operational efficiency
- You want comprehensive suite covering the entire asset lifecycle
In-Depth Analysis
Cartegraph
Manage and optimize public infrastructure assets with integrated government solutions.
Strengths
- Pro: Tailored specifically for government and public sector needs
- Pro: Integrated with a broader government operations platform (OpenGov Cloud)
- Pro: Focuses on optimizing public infrastructure lifecycles
Weaknesses
- Con: Primarily focused on government use cases, potentially less suitable for private sector
- Con: Specific feature details beyond asset management are not explicitly detailed on the provided page
Key features
CityWorks
GIS-centric asset lifecycle management for public infrastructure and community development.
Strengths
- Pro: Leverages existing GIS data for improved operational efficiency.
- Pro: Comprehensive suite covering the entire asset lifecycle.
- Pro: Enhances community engagement through public portals for issue reporting.
- Pro: Offers robust security and reliability with SaaS deployment.
- Pro: Integrates with other Trimble solutions like e-Builder for capital program management.
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires integration with ArcGIS for full GIS-centric functionality.
- Con: No free trial or transparent pricing information publicly available.
- Con: Primarily focused on large-scale infrastructure and government entities, potentially less suitable for smaller organizations.
Key features
Plans and prices: Cartegraph vs CityWorks
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cartegraph |
| cartegraph.com/plans read Oct 2, 2026 |
| CityWorks | No plan prices on file | cityworks.com/pricing |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Cartegraph pricing and CityWorks pricing.
Key Takeaways
Cartegraph
- Choose if you want manage and optimize public infrastructure assets with integrated government solutions
CityWorks
- Choose if you want GIS-centric asset lifecycle management for public infrastructure and community development
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.3/5 from 88 reviews for Cartegraph, 4.2/5 from 108 reviews for CityWorks).
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Cartegraph and CityWorks compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.3/5 from 88 reviews for Cartegraph, 4.2/5 from 108 reviews for CityWorks).
What are Cartegraph and CityWorks used for?
Cartegraph: Manage and optimize public infrastructure assets with integrated government solutions. CityWorks: GIS-centric asset lifecycle management for public infrastructure and community development.
What does Cartegraph cost vs CityWorks?
Cartegraph has no public paid-plan price on file. CityWorks has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Cartegraph and CityWorks?
Cartegraph's main strength: tailored specifically for government and public sector needs. CityWorks's main strength: leverages existing GIS data for improved operational efficiency.