Centrifugo vs Supabase Realtime: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Centrifugo and Supabase Realtime side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Supabase Realtime leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for interactive applications, designed for high performance and easy integration.
Best for you if:
- • You want a fully free tool (Supabase Realtime requires payment)
Supabase Realtime
Sync client state globally over WebSockets to build modern real-time web and mobile applications.
Best for you if:
- • You want simplifies real-time application development by abstracting backend complexity
| At a Glance | Centrifugo | Supabase Realtime |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free 100% free | Free plan |
Category | Developer Tools API Tools | Developer Tools Data & Databases |
Rating | 4.5/5 SourceForge 4.3 · G2 4.8 114 reviews | 4.7/5 G2 4.7 33 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Integration costs for specific APIs not included. | n/a |
Choose Centrifugo or Supabase Realtime?
Choose Centrifugo if
- You want a fully free tool (Supabase Realtime requires payment)
- You want high performance and scalability, proven to handle millions of connections
- You want easy integration with existing application architectures
Choose Supabase Realtime if
- You want simplifies real-time application development by abstracting backend complexity
- You want leverages existing Postgres knowledge and skills
In-Depth Analysis
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for interactive applications, designed for high performance and easy integration.
Centrifugo's pricing model is somewhat opaque for its premium offering.
Watch out
Integration costs for specific APIs not included.
Strengths
- Pro: High performance and scalability, proven to handle millions of connections.
- Pro: Easy integration with existing application architectures.
- Pro: Battle-tested and mature software used by many companies.
- Pro: Supports a wide range of real-time use cases.
- Pro: Offers a PRO version with advanced enterprise features.
Weaknesses
- Con: Self-hosted nature requires deployment and maintenance effort.
- Con: Advanced features are locked behind the PRO version.
Key features
Supabase Realtime
Sync client state globally over WebSockets to build modern real-time web and mobile applications.
Strengths
- Pro: Simplifies real-time application development by abstracting backend complexity.
- Pro: Leverages existing Postgres knowledge and skills.
- Pro: Offers a fully integrated suite of tools within the Supabase ecosystem.
- Pro: Scalable and dependable for growing applications.
- Pro: Easy to set up and use with convenient APIs.
Weaknesses
- Con: The documentation does not explicitly mention advanced features like message queuing, message persistence beyond active subscriptions, or guaranteed message delivery, which might be crucial for certain enterprise-grade real-time applications.
- Con: Details on security features beyond basic access control (e.g., end-to-end encryption for broadcast messages, advanced authentication mechanisms for channels) are not highlighted, which could be a concern for highly sensitive data.
Key features
Plans and prices: Centrifugo vs Supabase Realtime
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Centrifugo |
| centrifugal.devread Oct 2, 2026 |
| Supabase Realtime | No plan prices on file | supabase.com/pricing |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Centrifugo pricing and Supabase Realtime pricing.
Key Takeaways
Centrifugo
- Choose if you want scalable real-time messaging server for interactive applications, designed for high performance and easy integration
Supabase Realtime
- Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5
What the data shows
On the data below, Supabase Realtime leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Supabase Realtime has the higher user rating (4.5/5 from 114 reviews for Centrifugo, 4.7/5 from 33 reviews for Supabase Realtime).
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Centrifugo and Supabase Realtime compare in 2026?
On the data below, Supabase Realtime leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Supabase Realtime has the higher user rating (4.5/5 from 114 reviews for Centrifugo, 4.7/5 from 33 reviews for Supabase Realtime). Both have a free plan.
What are Centrifugo and Supabase Realtime used for?
Centrifugo: Scalable real-time messaging server for interactive applications, designed for high performance and easy integration. Supabase Realtime: Sync client state globally over WebSockets to build modern real-time web and mobile applications.
What does Centrifugo cost vs Supabase Realtime?
Centrifugo is free. Supabase Realtime has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Centrifugo and Supabase Realtime?
Centrifugo's main strength: high performance and scalability, proven to handle millions of connections. Supabase Realtime's main strength: simplifies real-time application development by abstracting backend complexity.