Dacast vs Mux: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Dacast and Mux side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Mux leads on lower entry price and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Dacast
Host, monetize, and broadcast live and on-demand video with an end-to-end streaming solution.
Best for you if:
- • You want to host, monetize, and broadcast live and on-demand video with an end-to-end streaming solution
Mux
Video infrastructure for developers
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Dacast | Mux |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $39/mo, billed monthly Starter plan | Free plan, paid from $20/mo Launch plan |
Category | Video Hosting Live Streaming | Video & Media Video Hosting |
Rating | 4.3/5 Capterra 4.3 · G2 4.3 260 reviews | 4.2/5 G2 4.4 · Trustpilot 3.2 21 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | Overage fees for exceeding data/storage limits | Live simulcasting is $0.020/min per target |
Choose Dacast or Mux?
Choose Dacast if
- You want to host, monetize, and broadcast live and on-demand video with an end-to-end streaming solution
Choose Mux if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- Budget matters ($20/mo vs $39/mo, billed monthly)
In-Depth Analysis
Dacast
Host, monetize, and broadcast live and on-demand video with an end-to-end streaming solution.
Dacast's pricing is competitive, especially for businesses needing robust live streaming and VOD capabilities.
Watch out
Overage fees for exceeding data/storage limits
Strengths
- Pro: Comprehensive end-to-end solution for live and VOD streaming.
- Pro: Strong monetization features including pay-per-view and paywall.
- Pro: Utilizes top-tier CDNs for scalable and high-quality delivery.
- Pro: Offers white-label capabilities for brand customization.
- Pro: Provides 24/7 technical support and professional services.
Weaknesses
- Con: Offers paid tiers for support, implying a higher overall cost.
- Con: No explicit mention of a free tier, only a free trial.
Key features
Mux
Video infrastructure for developers
Mux's pricing is quite generous, especially with the 100K free delivery minutes across all tiers and the $20 monthly credit in the 'Pay as You Go' plan.
Watch out
Live simulcasting is $0.020/min per target
Strengths
- Pro: Developer-first API design with comprehensive documentation
- Pro: Free tier with 100K delivery minutes and no credit card required
- Pro: Videos ready for playback in under 2 seconds on average
- Pro: Usage-based pricing with no upfront commitment on Pay as You Go
- Pro: Built-in analytics eliminate the need for a separate monitoring tool
Weaknesses
- Con: Usage-based pricing can become expensive at high volume
- Con: Free tier limited to 10 stored videos and on-demand only
- Con: Custom domains cost an additional fee
- Con: No built-in CMS or video management UI for non-developers
- Con: Live simulcasting billed separately per minute per target
Key features
Plans and prices: Dacast vs Mux
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Dacast |
| dacast.com/pricing read Nov 11, 2026 |
| Mux |
| mux.com/pricing read Nov 10, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Dacast pricing and Mux pricing.
Key Takeaways
Dacast
- Choose Dacast if you want to host, monetize, and broadcast live and on-demand video with an end-to-end streaming solution
Mux
- Lower entry price: $20/mo vs $39/mo, billed monthly
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Mux leads on lower entry price and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.3/5 from 260 reviews for Dacast, 4.2/5 from 21 reviews for Mux).
- Mux has the lower entry price: $20/mo (Launch) against $39/mo, billed monthly (Starter) for Dacast.
- Only Mux has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Dacast and Mux compare in 2026?
On the data below, Mux leads on lower entry price and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.3/5 from 260 reviews for Dacast, 4.2/5 from 21 reviews for Mux). Mux has the lower entry price: $20/mo (Launch) against $39/mo, billed monthly (Starter) for Dacast. Only Mux has a free plan.
What are Dacast and Mux used for?
Dacast: Host, monetize, and broadcast live and on-demand video with an end-to-end streaming solution. Mux: Video infrastructure for developers.
What does Dacast cost vs Mux?
Dacast's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $39/mo, billed monthly. Mux's cheapest paid plan is Launch at $20/mo; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 11, 2026.
What's the main difference between Dacast and Mux?
Dacast's main strength: comprehensive end-to-end solution for live and VOD streaming. Mux's main strength: developer-first API design with comprehensive documentation.
Spotted an outdated price or a wrong fact? Suggest a correction: we check it against the vendor's own page. Work for one of these vendors? Claim your listing to update it yourself.