esm.run vs Statically: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for esm.run and Statically side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
esm.run
Load modern JavaScript packages on-demand with global CDN performance.
Best for you if:
- • You want simplifies JavaScript module loading without a build step
Statically
Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.
Best for you if:
- • You want completely free to use
| At a Glance | esm.run | Statically |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free 100% free | Free 100% free |
Category | Developer Tools Hosting & Deployment | CDN Hosting & Deployment |
Rating | 4.3/5 SourceForge 4.3 67 reviews | 4.4/5 SourceForge 4.3 · G2 4.6 106 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Choose esm.run or Statically?
Choose esm.run if
- You want simplifies JavaScript module loading without a build step
- You want ensures high performance and uptime globally
- You work in developer tools, not CDN
Choose Statically if
- You want completely free to use
- You want fast global content delivery with low latency
- You work in CDN, not developer tools
In-Depth Analysis
esm.run
Load modern JavaScript packages on-demand with global CDN performance.
The pricing for esm.run is exceptionally generous as it offers a fully-featured CDN for JavaScript modules completely free of charge.
Strengths
- Pro: Simplifies JavaScript module loading without a build step
- Pro: Ensures high performance and uptime globally
- Pro: Utilizes advanced web delivery optimizations
- Pro: Suitable for quick demos and prototyping
- Pro: Free to use
Weaknesses
- Con: Currently in beta for production use
- Con: Limited information available on the website beyond core functionality
Key features
Statically
Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.
Statically's pricing is extremely generous, offering a fully functional global CDN for static assets completely free of charge.
Strengths
- Pro: Completely free to use
- Pro: Fast global content delivery with low latency
- Pro: Easy integration with popular Git platforms and npm
- Pro: Simplifies distribution of static assets for open-source projects
Weaknesses
- Con: Certain endpoints (e.g., /img/) may be disabled due to abuse
- Con: Reliance on third-party infrastructure (bunny.net, Cloudflare)
- Con: Primarily focused on static assets, not dynamic content
Key features
Plans and prices: esm.run vs Statically
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| esm.run |
| esm.run read Sep 30, 2026 |
| Statically |
| statically.io read Oct 3, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on esm.run pricing and Statically pricing.
Key Takeaways
esm.run
- Choose if you want load modern JavaScript packages on-demand with global CDN performance
Statically
- Choose if you want accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.3/5 from 67 reviews for esm.run, 4.4/5 from 106 reviews for Statically).
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do esm.run and Statically compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.3/5 from 67 reviews for esm.run, 4.4/5 from 106 reviews for Statically). Both have a free plan.
What are esm.run and Statically used for?
esm.run: Load modern JavaScript packages on-demand with global CDN performance. Statically: Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.
What does esm.run cost vs Statically?
esm.run is free. Statically is free. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 3, 2026.
What's the main difference between esm.run and Statically?
esm.run's main strength: simplifies JavaScript module loading without a build step. Statically's main strength: completely free to use.