Skip to content

esm.run vs Statically: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between esm.run and Statically comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.

Bottom line: esm.run is our overall pick for cdn workflows. Pick Statically if you need a fully free option.

··Methodology
Editor reviewed0 verified reviews comparedPricing checked May 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:

esm.run

Load modern JavaScript packages on-demand with global CDN performance.

Best for you if:

  • Delivers JavaScript modules on-demand via a global CDN.
  • Optimized for modern web browsers, Node.js, and Deno environments.

Statically

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

Best for you if:

  • Free global CDN for open-source projects.
  • Serves static assets directly from Git repositories and npm.
At a Glance
esm.runesm.run
StaticallyStatically
Starts at
Free
Free
Best For
CDNCDN
Rating
--

Choose esm.run or Statically?

esm.run

Choose esm.run if

Load modern JavaScript packages on-demand with global CDN performance.

  • Simplifies JavaScript module loading without a build step
  • Ensures high performance and uptime globally
  • Utilizes advanced web delivery optimizations
Statically

Choose Statically if

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

  • Completely free to use
  • Fast global content delivery with low latency
  • Easy integration with popular Git platforms and npm
Featureesm.runStatically
Pricing ModelFreeFree
User Rating
4.3/5
72 reviews
4.3/5
67 reviews
Categories
CDNDeveloper Tools
CDNHosting & Deployment

In-Depth Analysis

esm.runesm.run

Load modern JavaScript packages on-demand with global CDN performance.

Strengths

  • +Simplifies JavaScript module loading without a build step
  • +Ensures high performance and uptime globally
  • +Utilizes advanced web delivery optimizations
  • +Suitable for quick demos and prototyping
  • +Free to use

Weaknesses

  • -Currently in beta for production use
  • -Limited information available on the website beyond core functionality

Key features

On-demand JavaScript module buildsPermanent storage for built filesGlobal Multi-CDN powered by jsDelivrSupport for modern web browsers, Node.js, and DenoHTTP/2 and HTTP/3 deliveryCode minification
Starts at Free

StaticallyStatically

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

Strengths

  • +Completely free to use
  • +Fast global content delivery with low latency
  • +Easy integration with popular Git platforms and npm
  • +Simplifies distribution of static assets for open-source projects

Weaknesses

  • -Certain endpoints (e.g., /img/) may be disabled due to abuse
  • -Reliance on third-party infrastructure (bunny.net, Cloudflare)
  • -Primarily focused on static assets, not dynamic content

Key features

Global Content Delivery Network (CDN)Supports GitHub repositoriesSupports GitLab repositoriesSupports Bitbucket repositoriesSupports GitHub GistSupports npm packages
Starts at Free

Pricing: esm.run vs Statically

Planesm.runStatically
Tier 1
Free
Free
Free
Free

Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on esm.run pricing and Statically pricing.

Who Should Use What?

On a budget?

Both are free. Compare plans on their websites.

Go with: esm.run

Want the highest-rated option?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Go with: esm.run

Value user reviews?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Go with: esm.run

3 Questions to Help You Decide

1

What's your budget?

Both are free. Pricing won't help you decide here.

2

What's your use case?

Both are cdn tools. Compare their specific features to decide.

3

How important are ratings?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Key Takeaways

esm.run

  • Larger review base (72 reviews)
  • Completely free
  • Our pick for this comparison

Statically

  • Choose if you want accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN

The Bottom Line

esm.run is our pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is esm.run or Statically better?

esm.run is rated in our evaluation. Both are free.

What are esm.run and Statically used for?

esm.run: Load modern JavaScript packages on-demand with global CDN performance.. Statically: Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN..

What does esm.run cost vs Statically?

esm.run is completely free. Statically is completely free. Visit their websites for detailed pricing.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools