Skip to content
Toolradar

esm.sh vs Statically: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)

Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for esm.sh and Statically side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.

On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

Data comparison compiled by Toolradar, not hand-reviewed Methodology
Data comparison 106 user reviews compared Pricing checked Oct 3, 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:

esm.sh

Serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed.

Best for you if:

  • • You want simplifies modern web development by removing build steps

Statically

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

Best for you if:

  • • You want completely free to use
At a glance: esm.sh vs Statically
At a Glance
esm.sh esm.sh
Statically Statically
Starts at
Free 100% free
Free 100% free
Category
CDN Hosting & Deployment
CDN Hosting & Deployment
Rating
n/a 4.4/5 SourceForge 4.3 · G2 4.6 106 reviews
Free plan
 Yes Yes

Choose esm.sh or Statically?

esm.sh

Choose esm.sh if

  • You want simplifies modern web development by removing build steps
  • You want provides direct access to a vast ecosystem of NPM packages
Statically

Choose Statically if

  • You want completely free to use
  • You want fast global content delivery with low latency
esm.sh logo

esm.sh

Serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed.

Visit Website
Statically logo

Statically

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

Visit Website

In-Depth Analysis

esm.sh esm.sh

Serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed.

Strengths

  • Pro: Simplifies modern web development by removing build steps
  • Pro: Provides direct access to a vast ecosystem of NPM packages
  • Pro: Optimizes performance through bundling and tree shaking options
  • Pro: Supports various module registries for flexibility

Weaknesses

  • Con: Reliance on an external CDN for module delivery
  • Con: URL-based configuration can become lengthy for complex setups
  • Con: Potential for issues if CDN experiences downtime or performance degradation

Key features

Import NPM packages via HTTP URLs Support for import maps Supports NPM, JSR, GitHub, and pkg.pr.new registries On-the-fly transformation of .ts(x)/.vue/.svelte files Specify and alias dependencies via URL query parameters Configurable bundling strategies (e.g., ?bundle=false, ?standalone, ?raw)

Statically Statically

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

Great value

Statically's pricing is extremely generous, offering a fully functional global CDN for static assets completely free of charge.

Strengths

  • Pro: Completely free to use
  • Pro: Fast global content delivery with low latency
  • Pro: Easy integration with popular Git platforms and npm
  • Pro: Simplifies distribution of static assets for open-source projects

Weaknesses

  • Con: Certain endpoints (e.g., /img/) may be disabled due to abuse
  • Con: Reliance on third-party infrastructure (bunny.net, Cloudflare)
  • Con: Primarily focused on static assets, not dynamic content

Key features

Global Content Delivery Network (CDN) Supports GitHub repositories Supports GitLab repositories Supports Bitbucket repositories Supports GitHub Gist Supports npm packages

Plans and prices: esm.sh vs Statically

Plans and prices of esm.sh and Statically, as read on each vendor's pricing page. Each plan keeps its own billing unit.
Tool Plans and prices Source
esm.sh No plan prices on file esm.sh/pricing
Statically
  • Free: Free
statically.io read Oct 3, 2026

Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on esm.sh pricing and Statically pricing.

Key Takeaways

esm.sh

  • Choose if you want serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed

Statically

  • Choose if you want accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN

What the data shows

On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

  • Only Statically has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 106 reviews); esm.sh has none we can show.
  • Both have a free plan.

Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate

Frequently Asked Questions

How do esm.sh and Statically compare in 2026?

On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only Statically has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 106 reviews); esm.sh has none we can show. Both have a free plan.

What are esm.sh and Statically used for?

esm.sh: Serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed. Statically: Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

What does esm.sh cost vs Statically?

esm.sh is free. Statically is free. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 3, 2026.

What's the main difference between esm.sh and Statically?

esm.sh's main strength: simplifies modern web development by removing build steps. Statically's main strength: completely free to use.

Related Comparisons & Resources

esm.sh Alternatives Statically Alternatives esm.sh Full Review Statically Full Review
Compare other tools