Skip to content
Toolradar

esm.sh vs Statically: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between esm.sh and Statically comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.

Bottom line: Statically is our overall pick for cdn workflows. Pick esm.sh if you need developer tools.

··Methodology
Editor reviewed0 verified reviews comparedPricing checked May 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:

esm.sh

Serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed.

Best for you if:

  • • You need developer tools features specifically
  • • Serves NPM packages as ES modules directly to browsers/Deno.
  • • Eliminates the need for build tools and local package installations.

Statically

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

Best for you if:

  • • You need cdn features specifically
  • • Free global CDN for open-source projects.
  • • Serves static assets directly from Git repositories and npm.
At a Glance
esm.shesm.sh
StaticallyStatically
Starts at
Free
Free
Best For
Developer ToolsCDN
Rating
--

Choose esm.sh or Statically?

esm.sh

Choose esm.sh if

Serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed.

  • Simplifies modern web development by removing build steps
  • Provides direct access to a vast ecosystem of NPM packages
  • Optimizes performance through bundling and tree shaking options
  • Your work is developer tools-shaped, not cdn-shaped
Statically

Choose Statically if

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

  • Completely free to use
  • Fast global content delivery with low latency
  • Easy integration with popular Git platforms and npm
  • Your work is cdn-shaped, not developer tools-shaped
esm.sh logo

esm.sh

Serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed.

Visit Website
TOP RATED
Statically logo

Statically

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

Visit Website
Featureesm.shStatically
Pricing ModelFreeFree
User RatingNo ratings yet
★4.3/5
67 reviews
Categories
Developer ToolsCDN
CDNHosting & Deployment

In-Depth Analysis

esm.shesm.sh

Serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed.

Strengths

  • +Simplifies modern web development by removing build steps
  • +Provides direct access to a vast ecosystem of NPM packages
  • +Optimizes performance through bundling and tree shaking options
  • +Supports various module registries for flexibility

Weaknesses

  • -Reliance on an external CDN for module delivery
  • -URL-based configuration can become lengthy for complex setups
  • -Potential for issues if CDN experiences downtime or performance degradation

Key features

Import NPM packages via HTTP URLsSupport for import mapsSupports NPM, JSR, GitHub, and pkg.pr.new registriesOn-the-fly transformation of .ts(x)/.vue/.svelte filesSpecify and alias dependencies via URL query parametersConfigurable bundling strategies (e.g., ?bundle=false, ?standalone, ?raw)
Starts at Free

StaticallyStatically

Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN.

Strengths

  • +Completely free to use
  • +Fast global content delivery with low latency
  • +Easy integration with popular Git platforms and npm
  • +Simplifies distribution of static assets for open-source projects

Weaknesses

  • -Certain endpoints (e.g., /img/) may be disabled due to abuse
  • -Reliance on third-party infrastructure (bunny.net, Cloudflare)
  • -Primarily focused on static assets, not dynamic content

Key features

Global Content Delivery Network (CDN)Supports GitHub repositoriesSupports GitLab repositoriesSupports Bitbucket repositoriesSupports GitHub GistSupports npm packages
Starts at Free

Pricing: esm.sh vs Statically

Planesm.shStatically
Tier 1N/A
Free
Free

Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on esm.sh pricing and Statically pricing.

Who Should Use What?

On a budget?

Both are free. Compare plans on their websites.

Go with: esm.sh

Want the highest-rated option?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Go with: esm.sh

Value user reviews?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Go with: Statically

3 Questions to Help You Decide

1

What's your budget?

Both are free. Pricing won't help you decide here.

2

What's your use case?

esm.sh is a developer tools tool. Statically is in cdn. Pick the category that matches your needs.

3

How important are ratings?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Key Takeaways

Statically

  • Completely free
  • Our pick for this comparison

esm.sh

  • Better fit for developer tools

The Bottom Line

Statically is our pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is esm.sh or Statically better?

Statically is rated in our evaluation. Both are free.

What are esm.sh and Statically used for?

esm.sh: Serve NPM packages as modern ES modules directly in browsers and Deno, no build tools needed.. Statically: Accelerate static assets from Git repositories and npm packages via a global CDN..

What does esm.sh cost vs Statically?

esm.sh is completely free. Statically is completely free. Visit their websites for detailed pricing.

Related Comparisons & Resources

esm.sh AlternativesStatically Alternativesesm.sh Full ReviewStatically Full Review
Compare other tools