GLM-5.2 vs Sourcegraph Cody: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for GLM-5.2 and Sourcegraph Cody side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
GLM-5.2
Autonomous coding and engineering with a 1M token context
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with codebase context
| At a Glance | GLM-5.2 | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan | Free plan, paid from $9/user/mo, billed monthly Pro plan |
Category | AI Coding AI Assistants | AI Coding Developer Tools |
Rating | n/a | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 68 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Integration costs for specific tools not included. |
Choose GLM-5.2 or Sourcegraph Cody?
Choose GLM-5.2 if
- You need AI coding features specifically.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You need AI coding features specifically.
In-Depth Analysis
GLM-5.2
Autonomous coding and engineering with a 1M token context
Strengths
- Pro: Open weights under a permissive MIT license; download, fine-tune, and self-host freely
- Pro: 1-million-token context window for large codebases and long agent runs
- Pro: Strong coding benchmarks (SWE-bench Pro 62.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1 81.0)
- Pro: Roughly one-sixth the cost of comparable proprietary models
- Pro: Runs in 20+ coding environments plus the Z.ai API
Weaknesses
- Con: Running the full 753B model locally needs serious GPU hardware
- Con: The hosted Z.ai API routes data through a China-based provider, a compliance consideration for some teams
- Con: Newer model with a smaller tooling ecosystem than established providers
Key features
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with codebase context
Sourcegraph Cody's pricing is quite fair and generous, especially the Pro tier at $9 per user/month for unlimited usage and LLM choice.
Watch out
Integration costs for specific tools not included.
Strengths
- Pro: Codebase context
- Pro: Good for large repos
- Pro: Sourcegraph integration
- Pro: Multi-model support
- Pro: Enterprise features
Weaknesses
- Con: Sourcegraph dependency helpful
- Con: Setup for context
- Con: Less polished than Copilot
- Con: Enterprise pricing
- Con: Newer product
Key features
Plans and prices: GLM-5.2 vs Sourcegraph Cody
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GLM-5.2 | No plan prices on file | z.ai/subscribe |
| Sourcegraph Cody |
| sourcegraph.com/cody/pricing read Oct 1, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on GLM-5.2 pricing and Sourcegraph Cody pricing.
Key Takeaways
GLM-5.2
- Worth considering for AI coding
Sourcegraph Cody
- Worth considering for AI coding
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Only Sourcegraph Cody has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 68 reviews); GLM-5.2 has none we can show.
- Sourcegraph Cody starts at $9/user/mo, billed monthly; GLM-5.2 has no public paid plan price on file.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do GLM-5.2 and Sourcegraph Cody compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only Sourcegraph Cody has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 68 reviews); GLM-5.2 has none we can show. Sourcegraph Cody starts at $9/user/mo, billed monthly; GLM-5.2 has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.
What are GLM-5.2 and Sourcegraph Cody used for?
GLM-5.2: Autonomous coding and engineering with a 1M token context. Sourcegraph Cody: AI coding assistant with codebase context.
What does GLM-5.2 cost vs Sourcegraph Cody?
GLM-5.2 has no public paid-plan price on file. Sourcegraph Cody's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $9/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 1, 2026.
What's the main difference between GLM-5.2 and Sourcegraph Cody?
GLM-5.2's main strength: open weights under a permissive MIT license; download, fine-tune, and self-host freely. Sourcegraph Cody's main strength: codebase context.
Spotted an outdated price or a wrong fact? Suggest a correction: we check it against the vendor's own page. Work for one of these vendors? Claim your listing to update it yourself.