MiMo Code vs Sourcegraph Cody: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for MiMo Code and Sourcegraph Cody side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, MiMo Code leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
MiMo Code
Code with multimodal AI, hands-free
Best for you if:
- • You want optimized specifically for MiMo models, not a generic wrapper
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with codebase context
Best for you if:
- • You want codebase context
| At a Glance | MiMo Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $4/user/mo, billed monthly Team plan | Free plan, paid from $9/user/mo, billed monthly Pro plan |
Category | AI Coding Developer Tools | AI Coding Developer Tools |
Rating | n/a | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 68 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Overage fees for CI/CD minutes beyond limits | Integration costs for specific tools not included. |
Choose MiMo Code or Sourcegraph Cody?
Choose MiMo Code if
- You want optimized specifically for MiMo models, not a generic wrapper
- You want comprehensive multimodal input and output capabilities
- Budget matters ($4/user/mo, billed monthly vs $9/user/mo, billed monthly)
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You want codebase context
- You want good for large repos
In-Depth Analysis
MiMo Code
Code with multimodal AI, hands-free
The pricing for MiMo Code appears fair, especially with a robust free tier and a competitively priced Team plan at $4 USD per user/month.
Watch out
Overage fees for CI/CD minutes beyond limits
Strengths
- Pro: Optimized specifically for MiMo models, not a generic wrapper
- Pro: Comprehensive multimodal input and output capabilities
- Pro: Transparent cost management and model selection for efficiency
- Pro: Free and open-source, promoting community contributions
- Pro: Provides a native desktop experience for major operating systems
Weaknesses
- Con: Only supports MiMo models, limiting model choice
- Con: No terminal user interface (TUI) planned
- Con: Linux support requires building from source
Key features
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with codebase context
Sourcegraph Cody's pricing is quite fair and generous, especially the Pro tier at $9 per user/month for unlimited usage and LLM choice.
Watch out
Integration costs for specific tools not included.
Strengths
- Pro: Codebase context
- Pro: Good for large repos
- Pro: Sourcegraph integration
- Pro: Multi-model support
- Pro: Enterprise features
Weaknesses
- Con: Sourcegraph dependency helpful
- Con: Setup for context
- Con: Less polished than Copilot
- Con: Enterprise pricing
- Con: Newer product
Key features
Plans and prices: MiMo Code vs Sourcegraph Cody
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| MiMo Code |
| github.com/pricing read Oct 15, 2026 |
| Sourcegraph Cody |
| sourcegraph.com/cody/pricing read Oct 1, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on MiMo Code pricing and Sourcegraph Cody pricing.
Key Takeaways
MiMo Code
- Lower entry price: $4/user/mo, billed monthly vs $9/user/mo, billed monthly
Sourcegraph Cody
- Choose if you want AI coding assistant with codebase context
What the data shows
On the data below, MiMo Code leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Sourcegraph Cody has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 68 reviews); MiMo Code has none we can show.
- MiMo Code has the lower entry price: $4/user/mo, billed monthly (Team) against $9/user/mo, billed monthly (Pro) for Sourcegraph Cody.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do MiMo Code and Sourcegraph Cody compare in 2026?
On the data below, MiMo Code leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Sourcegraph Cody has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 68 reviews); MiMo Code has none we can show. MiMo Code has the lower entry price: $4/user/mo, billed monthly (Team) against $9/user/mo, billed monthly (Pro) for Sourcegraph Cody. Both have a free plan.
What are MiMo Code and Sourcegraph Cody used for?
MiMo Code: Code with multimodal AI, hands-free. Sourcegraph Cody: AI coding assistant with codebase context.
What does MiMo Code cost vs Sourcegraph Cody?
MiMo Code's cheapest paid plan is Team at $4/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Sourcegraph Cody's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $9/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 15, 2026.
What's the main difference between MiMo Code and Sourcegraph Cody?
MiMo Code's main strength: optimized specifically for MiMo models, not a generic wrapper. Sourcegraph Cody's main strength: codebase context.