Nhost vs Supabase: Which is Better in 2026?
Choosing between Nhost and Supabase comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:
Nhost
Open-source Firebase alternative
Best for you if:
- • You need low-code backend features specifically
- • Nhost is a backend-as-a-service platform with GraphQL and Postgres
- • It provides authentication, storage, and serverless functions for app development
Supabase
Open source Firebase alternative
Best for you if:
- • You need data & databases features specifically
- • Open-source Firebase alternative
- • PostgreSQL with real-time subscriptions
| At a Glance |  Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | $25/moPro | $25/moPro |
Best For | Low-Code Backend | Data & Databases |
Rating | - | - |
Choose Nhost or Supabase?
Choose Nhost if
Open-source Firebase alternative
- Open source backend
- Firebase alternative
- GraphQL built-in
- Your work is low-code backend-shaped, not data & databases-shaped
Choose Supabase if
Open source Firebase alternative
- Full PostgreSQL access
- Generous free tier
- Open-source and self-hostable
- Your work is data & databases-shaped, not low-code backend-shaped
| Feature | Nhost | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| User Rating | No ratings yet | ★4.7/5 33 reviews |
| Categories | Low-Code BackendCloud & Infrastructure | Data & DatabasesAPI Tools |
In-Depth Analysis
Nhost
Open-source Firebase alternative
Strengths
- +Open source backend
- +Firebase alternative
- +GraphQL built-in
- +Self-hostable
- +Good documentation
Weaknesses
- -Newer platform
- -Smaller community
- -Learning curve
- -Enterprise features paid
- -Still maturing
Key features
Supabase
Open source Firebase alternative
Strengths
- +Full PostgreSQL access
- +Generous free tier
- +Open-source and self-hostable
- +Great developer experience
Weaknesses
- -Projects pause on free tier
- -Smaller ecosystem than Firebase
- -Less mature than alternatives
Key features
Pricing: Nhost vs Supabase
| Plan | Nhost | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Free Starter | $0 Free |
| Tier 2 | $25 Pro | $25 Pro |
| Tier 3 | N/A | $599 Team |
| Tier 4 | N/A | Custom Enterprise |
Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on Nhost pricing and Supabase pricing.
Who Should Use What?
On a budget?
Both are freemium. Compare plans on their websites.
Go with: Nhost
Want the highest-rated option?
Neither has user reviews yet.
Go with: Nhost
Value user reviews?
Neither has user reviews yet.
Go with: Supabase
3 Questions to Help You Decide
What's your budget?
Both are freemium. Pricing won't help you decide here.
What's your use case?
Nhost is a low-code backend tool. Supabase is in data & databases. Pick the category that matches your needs.
How important are ratings?
Neither has user reviews yet.
Key Takeaways
Supabase
- Free tier available
- Our pick for this comparison
Nhost
- Better fit for low-code backend
The Bottom Line
Supabase is our pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Nhost or Supabase better?
Supabase is rated in our evaluation. Both are freemium.
What are Nhost and Supabase used for?
Nhost: Open-source Firebase alternative. Supabase: Open source Firebase alternative.
What does Nhost cost vs Supabase?
Nhost is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Supabase is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.