Optimus vs TinyPNG: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Optimus and TinyPNG side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Optimus
Smart image compression for WordPress to accelerate websites and improve PageSpeed.
Best for you if:
- • You want a tool that optimizes all image sizes, including thumbnails, unlike many other tools
TinyPNG
Smart image compression and conversion for faster websites and improved SEO.
Best for you if:
- • You want a tool that significantly reduces image file sizes without visible quality degradation
| At a Glance | Optimus | TinyPNG |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $3.25/mo, billed yearly Optimus HQ plan | Free 100% free |
Category | SEO Tools Image Editing | Image Editing Developer Tools |
Rating | 4.6/5 G2 4.6 10 reviews | 4.7/5 G2 4.7 36 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | 5MB image limit can be restrictive |
Choose Optimus or TinyPNG?
Choose Optimus if
- You want a tool that optimizes all image sizes, including thumbnails, unlike many other tools
Choose TinyPNG if
- You want a tool that significantly reduces image file sizes without visible quality degradation
- You want a tool that supports modern image formats like AVIF and WebP for optimal web performance
In-Depth Analysis
Optimus
Smart image compression for WordPress to accelerate websites and improve PageSpeed.
Optimus offers a fair pricing structure, especially with its generous free tier and the affordable Optimus HQ at $39/year.
Strengths
- Pro: Significant file size reduction (up to 70%) while maintaining visual quality
- Pro: Optimizes all image sizes, including thumbnails, unlike many other tools
- Pro: Improves website loading times and PageSpeed scores, benefiting SEO
- Pro: Generates WebP and progressive JPEGs for modern web performance
- Pro: Transparent pricing with no hidden costs or automatic renewals
Weaknesses
- Con: Free version has a strict 100 KB file size limit per image
- Con: Requires images to be transferred to Optimus servers for processing
- Con: Free version does not include WebP conversion or HTTPS connection
Key features
TinyPNG
Smart image compression and conversion for faster websites and improved SEO.
TinyPNG offers a fair and generous free tier, allowing users to compress a significant number of images without cost.
Watch out
5MB image limit can be restrictive
Strengths
- Pro: Significantly reduces image file sizes without visible quality degradation.
- Pro: Supports modern image formats like AVIF and WebP for optimal web performance.
- Pro: Offers multiple integration options (web tool, API, WordPress plugin) to suit different needs.
- Pro: Improves website loading times and SEO.
- Pro: User-friendly online interface for quick compression.
Weaknesses
- Con: Free tier has limitations on image size and quantity per session.
- Con: Automatic renewals for subscriptions are currently only enabled for credit card payments.
- Con: Does not offer a free trial for paid features, though the free tier allows testing the algorithm.
Key features
Plans and prices: Optimus vs TinyPNG
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Optimus |
| optimus.io/pricing read Nov 10, 2026 |
| TinyPNG |
| tinypng.com read Nov 9, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Optimus pricing and TinyPNG pricing.
Key Takeaways
Optimus
- Worth considering for SEO tools
TinyPNG
- Worth considering for image editing
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.6/5 from 10 reviews for Optimus, 4.7/5 from 36 reviews for TinyPNG; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides).
- Optimus starts at $3.25/mo, billed yearly; TinyPNG has no public paid plan price on file.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Optimus and TinyPNG compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.6/5 from 10 reviews for Optimus, 4.7/5 from 36 reviews for TinyPNG; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides). Optimus starts at $3.25/mo, billed yearly; TinyPNG has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.
What are Optimus and TinyPNG used for?
Optimus: Smart image compression for WordPress to accelerate websites and improve PageSpeed. TinyPNG: Smart image compression and conversion for faster websites and improved SEO.
What does Optimus cost vs TinyPNG?
Optimus's cheapest paid plan is Optimus HQ at $3.25/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. TinyPNG is free. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 10, 2026.
What's the main difference between Optimus and TinyPNG?
Optimus's main strength: significant file size reduction (up to 70%) while maintaining visual quality. TinyPNG's main strength: significantly reduces image file sizes without visible quality degradation.
Spotted an outdated price or a wrong fact? Suggest a correction: we check it against the vendor's own page. Work for one of these vendors? Claim your listing to update it yourself.