Stream vs Supabase Realtime: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Stream and Supabase Realtime side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Supabase Realtime leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Stream
Add chat and activity feeds to your app
Best for you if:
- • You want chat and activity feeds
Supabase Realtime
Sync client state globally over WebSockets to build modern real-time web and mobile applications.
Best for you if:
- • You want simplifies real-time application development by abstracting backend complexity
| At a Glance | Stream | Supabase Realtime |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan | Free plan |
Category | API Tools Communication | Developer Tools Data & Databases |
Rating | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 53 reviews | 4.7/5 G2 4.7 33 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Custom pricing for 'Scale' and 'Enterprise' can lead to high costs. | n/a |
Choose Stream or Supabase Realtime?
Choose Stream if
- You want chat and activity feeds
- You want good APIs
- You work in API tools, not developer tools
Choose Supabase Realtime if
- You want simplifies real-time application development by abstracting backend complexity
- You want leverages existing Postgres knowledge and skills
- You work in developer tools, not API tools
In-Depth Analysis
Stream
Add chat and activity feeds to your app
Stream's pricing model is generous for early-stage projects with its free 'Maker' tier offering 5M messages and 100 concurrent users.
Watch out
Custom pricing for 'Scale' and 'Enterprise' can lead to high costs.
Strengths
- Pro: Chat and activity feeds
- Pro: Good APIs
- Pro: Active development
- Pro: Good documentation
- Pro: Scalable
Weaknesses
- Con: Expensive at scale
- Con: MAU-based pricing
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Vendor lock-in
- Con: Feature complexity
Key features
Supabase Realtime
Sync client state globally over WebSockets to build modern real-time web and mobile applications.
Strengths
- Pro: Simplifies real-time application development by abstracting backend complexity.
- Pro: Leverages existing Postgres knowledge and skills.
- Pro: Offers a fully integrated suite of tools within the Supabase ecosystem.
- Pro: Scalable and dependable for growing applications.
- Pro: Easy to set up and use with convenient APIs.
Weaknesses
- Con: The documentation does not explicitly mention advanced features like message queuing, message persistence beyond active subscriptions, or guaranteed message delivery, which might be crucial for certain enterprise-grade real-time applications.
- Con: Details on security features beyond basic access control (e.g., end-to-end encryption for broadcast messages, advanced authentication mechanisms for channels) are not highlighted, which could be a concern for highly sensitive data.
Key features
Plans and prices: Stream vs Supabase Realtime
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Stream |
| getstream.io/pricingread Oct 7, 2026 |
| Supabase Realtime | No plan prices on file | supabase.com/pricing |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Stream pricing and Supabase Realtime pricing.
Key Takeaways
Stream
- Choose if you want add chat and activity feeds to your app
Supabase Realtime
- Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5
What the data shows
On the data below, Supabase Realtime leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Supabase Realtime has the higher user rating (4.5/5 from 53 reviews for Stream, 4.7/5 from 33 reviews for Supabase Realtime).
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Stream and Supabase Realtime compare in 2026?
On the data below, Supabase Realtime leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Supabase Realtime has the higher user rating (4.5/5 from 53 reviews for Stream, 4.7/5 from 33 reviews for Supabase Realtime). Both have a free plan.
What are Stream and Supabase Realtime used for?
Stream: Add chat and activity feeds to your app. Supabase Realtime: Sync client state globally over WebSockets to build modern real-time web and mobile applications.
What does Stream cost vs Supabase Realtime?
Stream has no public paid-plan price on file. Supabase Realtime has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 7, 2026.
What's the main difference between Stream and Supabase Realtime?
Stream's main strength: chat and activity feeds. Supabase Realtime's main strength: simplifies real-time application development by abstracting backend complexity.