Skip to content

Aikido Security vs Snyk: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)

Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Aikido Security and Snyk side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.

On the data: On the data below, Aikido Security leads on higher user rating; Snyk leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.

Data comparison compiled by Toolradar, not hand-reviewed Methodology
Data comparison 417 user reviews compared Pricing checked Nov 2, 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:

Aikido Security

Secure your code, cloud, and runtime in one central system, finding and fixing vulnerabilities automatically.

Best for you if:

  • • You want consolidates multiple security tools into a single platform, reducing complexity and cost

Snyk

Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production

Best for you if:

  • • You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
At a glance: Aikido Security vs Snyk
At a Glance
Aikido Security Aikido Security
Snyk Snyk
Starts at
Not published
Free plan, paid from $25/mo flat, billed monthly Team plan
Category
Security DevOps
Security Testing & QA
Rating
4.7/5 G2 4.7 260 reviews 4.5/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 157 reviews
Free plan
No No
Watch out for
n/a Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines

Choose Aikido Security or Snyk?

Aikido Security

Choose Aikido Security if

  • You want consolidates multiple security tools into a single platform, reducing complexity and cost
  • You want AI-powered Autofix significantly speeds up remediation of vulnerabilities
Snyk

Choose Snyk if

  • You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
  • You want broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform

In-Depth Analysis

Aikido Security Aikido Security

Secure your code, cloud, and runtime in one central system, finding and fixing vulnerabilities automatically.

Strengths

  • Pro: Consolidates multiple security tools into a single platform, reducing complexity and cost.
  • Pro: AI-powered Autofix significantly speeds up remediation of vulnerabilities.
  • Pro: Agentic AI Pentesting offers rapid, audit-grade security assessments.
  • Pro: Low false positives and intelligent alert prioritization reduce developer fatigue.
  • Pro: Seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines and IDEs enables shift-left security.

Weaknesses

  • Con: No free tier explicitly mentioned, which might be a barrier for smaller teams or individual developers.
  • Con: The breadth of features might have a learning curve for new users.
  • Con: Specific pricing details are not immediately transparent on the main pages, requiring a demo or contact.

Key features

AI Autofix for SAST, IaC, SCA, and containers Static Code Analysis (SAST) Open Source Dependencies (SCA) scanning with malware detection Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Infrastructure as Code (IaC) scanning Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Snyk Snyk

Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production

Fair value

Snyk Free is usable for individual developers but test limits are tight (200 SCA, 100 SAST, 100 container tests/month).

Watch out

Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines

Strengths

  • Pro: Developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
  • Pro: Broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
  • Pro: Automated fix pull requests save significant remediation time
  • Pro: Generous free tier with 200 open-source and 100 code tests per month
  • Pro: AI-powered prioritization focuses teams on the most exploitable vulnerabilities first

Weaknesses

  • Con: Team plan limited to 10 developers per organization, requiring Ignite for larger teams
  • Con: Ignite tier at $1,260/year per developer is expensive for mid-size teams
  • Con: DAST scanning limited to 10 targets even on Ignite plan
  • Con: Advanced features like custom rules and SSO only available on Ignite and above
  • Con: Can produce noisy results on large monorepos without careful policy tuning

Key features

Static application security testing (SAST) for first-party code Software composition analysis (SCA) for open-source dependencies Container image vulnerability scanning with base image recommendations Infrastructure-as-Code security scanning for Terraform, Kubernetes, and CloudFormation Dynamic application security testing (DAST) for APIs and web apps AI-powered vulnerability prioritization based on exploitability and context

Plans and prices: Aikido Security vs Snyk

Plans and prices of Aikido Security and Snyk, as read on each vendor's pricing page. Each plan keeps its own billing unit.
Tool Plans and prices Source
Aikido Security No plan prices on file aikido.dev/pricing
Snyk
  • Free: Free
  • Team: $25/mo flat, billed monthly
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing
snyk.io/plans read Nov 2, 2026

Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Aikido Security pricing and Snyk pricing.

Key Takeaways

Aikido Security

  • Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5

Snyk

  • Has a free plan

What the data shows

On the data below, Aikido Security leads on higher user rating; Snyk leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.

  • Aikido Security has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 260 reviews for Aikido Security, 4.5/5 from 157 reviews for Snyk).
  • Snyk starts at $25/mo flat, billed monthly; Aikido Security has no public paid plan price on file.
  • Only Snyk has a free plan.

Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate

Frequently Asked Questions

How do Aikido Security and Snyk compare in 2026?

On the data below, Aikido Security leads on higher user rating; Snyk leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Aikido Security has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 260 reviews for Aikido Security, 4.5/5 from 157 reviews for Snyk). Snyk starts at $25/mo flat, billed monthly; Aikido Security has no public paid plan price on file. Only Snyk has a free plan.

What are Aikido Security and Snyk used for?

Aikido Security: Secure your code, cloud, and runtime in one central system, finding and fixing vulnerabilities automatically. Snyk: Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production.

What does Aikido Security cost vs Snyk?

Aikido Security has no public paid-plan price on file. Snyk's cheapest paid plan is Team at $25/mo flat, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 2, 2026.

What's the main difference between Aikido Security and Snyk?

Aikido Security's main strength: consolidates multiple security tools into a single platform, reducing complexity and cost. Snyk's main strength: developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools