Amundsen vs Stemma: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Amundsen and Stemma side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Amundsen leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Amundsen
Open-source data discovery and metadata engine for enhanced data trust and productivity.
Best for you if:
- • You want a fully free tool (Stemma requires payment)
Stemma
Automated data catalog for modern data teams.
Best for you if:
- • You want reduces manual effort in data cataloging
| At a Glance | ||
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free 100% free | Not published |
Category | Data & Databases Developer Tools | Data & Databases Developer Tools |
Rating | n/a | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | No |
Watch out for | Requires internal engineering resources for setup and maintenance. | n/a |
Choose Amundsen or Stemma?
Choose Amundsen if
- You want a fully free tool (Stemma requires payment)
- You want enhances data discoverability and trust
- You want increases productivity for data professionals
Choose Stemma if
- You want reduces manual effort in data cataloging
- You want improves data discoverability for data teams
In-Depth Analysis
Amundsen
Open-source data discovery and metadata engine for enhanced data trust and productivity.
Amundsen is an open-source project, making its 'Open Source' tier completely free.
Watch out
Requires internal engineering resources for setup and maintenance.
Strengths
- Pro: Enhances data discoverability and trust
- Pro: Increases productivity for data professionals
- Pro: Reduces data silos and improves collaboration
- Pro: Provides automated and curated metadata
- Pro: Open-source with an Apache License 2.0
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires self-hosting and setup
- Con: Integration effort may be needed for specific data sources
- Con: Community support may be the primary resource
Key features
Stemma
Automated data catalog for modern data teams.
Strengths
- Pro: Reduces manual effort in data cataloging
- Pro: Improves data discoverability for data teams
- Pro: Enhances trust in data through lineage and governance
- Pro: Accelerates data-driven decision making
Weaknesses
- Con: No explicit free tier mentioned
- Con: Pricing details not publicly available
Key features
Plans and prices: Amundsen vs Stemma
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Amundsen |
| amundsen.io read Oct 2, 2026 |
| Stemma | No plan prices on file | stemma.ai |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Amundsen pricing and Stemma pricing.
Key Takeaways
Amundsen
- Has a free plan
Stemma
- Choose if you want automated data catalog for modern data teams
What the data shows
On the data below, Amundsen leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Amundsen has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Amundsen and Stemma compare in 2026?
On the data below, Amundsen leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Amundsen has a free plan.
What are Amundsen and Stemma used for?
Amundsen: Open-source data discovery and metadata engine for enhanced data trust and productivity. Stemma: Automated data catalog for modern data teams.
What does Amundsen cost vs Stemma?
Amundsen is free. Stemma has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Amundsen and Stemma?
Amundsen's main strength: enhances data discoverability and trust. Stemma's main strength: reduces manual effort in data cataloging.