Aqua Security vs Matano: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Aqua Security and Matano side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Aqua Security
Cloud native security for containers and Kubernetes
Best for you if:
- • You want container security leader
Matano
Open-source security lake platform for cloud-native environments.
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Aqua Security | Matano |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $10,188/year Team plan | Free plan |
Category | Security DevOps | Cloud & Infrastructure Security |
Rating | 4.2/5 G2 4.2 57 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Choose Aqua Security or Matano?
Choose Aqua Security if
- You want container security leader
- You want kubernetes native
- You work in security, not cloud & infrastructure
Choose Matano if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want cost-effective due to serverless and open-source nature
- You want highly scalable for large volumes of security logs
- You work in cloud & infrastructure, not security
In-Depth Analysis
Aqua Security
Cloud native security for containers and Kubernetes
Aqua Security's pricing is fair, offering a free Developer tier for non-production use.
Strengths
- Pro: Container security leader
- Pro: Kubernetes native
- Pro: Runtime protection
- Pro: Compliance features
- Pro: Good scanning
Weaknesses
- Con: Expensive
- Con: Complex setup
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Enterprise focus
- Con: Resource overhead
Key features
Matano
Open-source security lake platform for cloud-native environments.
Strengths
- Pro: Cost-effective due to serverless and open-source nature
- Pro: Highly scalable for large volumes of security logs
- Pro: Flexible and customizable for specific security needs
- Pro: Leverages familiar AWS services
- Pro: Strong community support as an open-source project
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires AWS expertise for deployment and management
- Con: Steep learning curve for those new to security lakes or serverless
- Con: Primarily focused on AWS environments, less suited for multi-cloud
Key features
Plans and prices: Aqua Security vs Matano
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Aqua Security |
| aquasec.com/pricing read Oct 2, 2026 |
| Matano | No plan prices on file | matano.dev |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Aqua Security pricing and Matano pricing.
Key Takeaways
Aqua Security
- Choose if you want cloud native security for containers and Kubernetes
Matano
- Choose if you want open-source security lake platform for cloud-native environments
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Only Aqua Security has a published user rating (4.2/5 from 57 reviews); Matano has none we can show.
- Aqua Security starts at $10,188/year; Matano has no public paid plan price on file.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Aqua Security and Matano compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only Aqua Security has a published user rating (4.2/5 from 57 reviews); Matano has none we can show. Aqua Security starts at $10,188/year; Matano has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.
What are Aqua Security and Matano used for?
Aqua Security: Cloud native security for containers and Kubernetes. Matano: Open-source security lake platform for cloud-native environments.
What does Aqua Security cost vs Matano?
Aqua Security's cheapest paid plan is Team at $10,188/year. Matano has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Aqua Security and Matano?
Aqua Security's main strength: container security leader. Matano's main strength: cost-effective due to serverless and open-source nature.