Astro vs Gatsby: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Astro and Gatsby side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Astro
Build fast content sites with less JavaScript
Best for you if:
- • You want zero JavaScript by default
Gatsby
Build fast, secure, and powerful web experiences with a React-based, open-source framework.
Best for you if:
- • You want builds extremely fast, accessible, and responsive websites
| At a Glance | Astro | Gatsby |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan | Free plan, paid from $9/mo, billed monthly Personal plan |
Category | Developer Tools UI/UX Design | Developer Tools Hosting & Deployment |
Rating | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 136 reviews | 4.8/5 G2 4.8 17 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Hosting is separate, but free tiers from Vercel/Netlify/Cloudflare cover most sites | Additional concurrent builds cost $40 each. |
Choose Astro or Gatsby?
Choose Astro if
- You want zero JavaScript by default
- You want content-focused architecture
Choose Gatsby if
- You want builds extremely fast, accessible, and responsive websites
- You want simplifies data integration from various sources using GraphQL
In-Depth Analysis
Astro
Build fast content sites with less JavaScript
Astro is completely free and open-source under the MIT license.
Watch out
Hosting is separate, but free tiers from Vercel/Netlify/Cloudflare cover most sites
Strengths
- Pro: Zero JavaScript by default
- Pro: Content-focused architecture
- Pro: Use any UI framework
- Pro: Great for blogs and docs
- Pro: Excellent performance
Weaknesses
- Con: Not for complex apps
- Con: Island architecture confusing
- Con: Smaller ecosystem
- Con: Less suitable for SPAs
- Con: Learning curve
Key features
Gatsby
Build fast, secure, and powerful web experiences with a React-based, open-source framework.
Gatsby's pricing is quite generous, especially with its robust Free tier offering 300 credits and unlimited deploy previews.
Watch out
Additional concurrent builds cost $40 each.
Strengths
- Pro: Builds extremely fast, accessible, and responsive websites.
- Pro: Simplifies data integration from various sources using GraphQL.
- Pro: Offers flexibility in rendering and deployment options.
- Pro: Provides a robust developer experience with stable and intuitive functionality.
- Pro: Strong documentation and a supportive ecosystem.
Weaknesses
- Con: Build times scale poorly as a site grows because every content source is pulled through Gatsby's GraphQL data layer, so sites with thousands of pages or images can take many minutes to rebuild, and the incremental-build feature that mitigated this was tied to the now-discontinued Gatsby Cloud.
- Con: Gatsby routes even simple content through a mandatory GraphQL data layer, adding boilerplate and a real learning curve that competing React frameworks like Next.js let you skip with more direct data fetching.
- Con: Since Netlify acquired Gatsby and folded Gatsby Cloud into its own hosting platform, the framework's momentum has stalled, with the last release shipping in February 2025 and nothing since, while Next.js has become the default choice for new React projects.
- Con: Gatsby relies heavily on third-party plugins for sourcing data and processing images, and version mismatches between plugins and the core framework are a common source of broken builds during upgrades.
Key features
Plans and prices: Astro vs Gatsby
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Astro |
| astro.build read Oct 7, 2026 |
| Gatsby |
| gatsbyjs.com/pricing read Oct 28, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Astro pricing and Gatsby pricing.
Key Takeaways
Astro
- Choose if you want build fast content sites with less JavaScript
Gatsby
- Choose if you want build fast, secure, and powerful web experiences with a React-based, open-source framework
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.5/5 from 136 reviews for Astro, 4.8/5 from 17 reviews for Gatsby; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides).
- Gatsby starts at $9/mo, billed monthly; Astro has no public paid plan price on file.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Astro and Gatsby compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.5/5 from 136 reviews for Astro, 4.8/5 from 17 reviews for Gatsby; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides). Gatsby starts at $9/mo, billed monthly; Astro has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.
What are Astro and Gatsby used for?
Astro: Build fast content sites with less JavaScript. Gatsby: Build fast, secure, and powerful web experiences with a React-based, open-source framework.
What does Astro cost vs Gatsby?
Astro has no public paid-plan price on file. Gatsby's cheapest paid plan is Personal at $9/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 28, 2026.
What's the main difference between Astro and Gatsby?
Astro's main strength: zero JavaScript by default. Gatsby's main strength: builds extremely fast, accessible, and responsive websites.