Augment Code vs Sourcegraph Cody: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Sourcegraph Cody leads on higher user rating and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Augment Code
Build software with AI agents that understand your entire codebase, from IDE to CLI to code review.
Best for you if:
- • You want deep contextual understanding leads to higher quality AI-generated code
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with codebase context
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Augment Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $20/mo flat, billed monthly STANDARD plan | Free plan, paid from $9/user/mo, billed monthly Pro plan |
Category | AI Coding AI Assistants | AI Coding Developer Tools |
Rating | 4.3/5 G2 4.1 · SourceForge 5.0 22 reviews | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 68 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Integration costs for specific tools not included. |
Choose Augment Code or Sourcegraph Cody?
Choose Augment Code if
- You want deep contextual understanding leads to higher quality AI-generated code
- You want integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (IDE, CLI, GitHub)
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want codebase context
- You want good for large repos
In-Depth Analysis
Augment Code
Build software with AI agents that understand your entire codebase, from IDE to CLI to code review.
The pricing for Augment Code appears fair, especially for individual developers and small teams.
Strengths
- Pro: Deep contextual understanding leads to higher quality AI-generated code
- Pro: Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (IDE, CLI, GitHub)
- Pro: Automated code review catches critical bugs and reduces noise
- Pro: Agents can handle complex, multi-step tasks with planning
- Pro: Memory and prompt enhancement features improve AI accuracy and reduce manual effort
Weaknesses
- Con: Credit-based pricing model might be complex for some teams to manage
- Con: No explicit free tier mentioned, only paid plans
- Con: Requires installation and potential integration effort
Key features
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with codebase context
Sourcegraph Cody's pricing is quite fair and generous, especially the Pro tier at $9 per user/month for unlimited usage and LLM choice.
Watch out
Integration costs for specific tools not included.
Strengths
- Pro: Codebase context
- Pro: Good for large repos
- Pro: Sourcegraph integration
- Pro: Multi-model support
- Pro: Enterprise features
Weaknesses
- Con: Sourcegraph dependency helpful
- Con: Setup for context
- Con: Less polished than Copilot
- Con: Enterprise pricing
- Con: Newer product
Key features
Plans and prices: Augment Code vs Sourcegraph Cody
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Augment Code |
| augmentcode.com/pricing read Nov 2, 2026 |
| Sourcegraph Cody |
| sourcegraph.com/cody/pricing read Oct 1, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Augment Code pricing and Sourcegraph Cody pricing.
Key Takeaways
Augment Code
- Choose if you want build software with AI agents that understand your entire codebase, from IDE to CLI to code review
Sourcegraph Cody
- Higher user rating: 4.5/5 vs 4.3/5
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Sourcegraph Cody leads on higher user rating and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Sourcegraph Cody has the higher user rating (4.3/5 from 22 reviews for Augment Code, 4.5/5 from 68 reviews for Sourcegraph Cody).
- Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Augment Code $20/mo flat, billed monthly; Sourcegraph Cody $9/user/mo, billed monthly.
- Only Sourcegraph Cody has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody compare in 2026?
On the data below, Sourcegraph Cody leads on higher user rating and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Sourcegraph Cody has the higher user rating (4.3/5 from 22 reviews for Augment Code, 4.5/5 from 68 reviews for Sourcegraph Cody). Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Augment Code $20/mo flat, billed monthly; Sourcegraph Cody $9/user/mo, billed monthly. Only Sourcegraph Cody has a free plan.
What are Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody used for?
Augment Code: Build software with AI agents that understand your entire codebase, from IDE to CLI to code review. Sourcegraph Cody: AI coding assistant with codebase context.
What does Augment Code cost vs Sourcegraph Cody?
Augment Code's cheapest paid plan is STANDARD at $20/mo flat, billed monthly. Sourcegraph Cody's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $9/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody?
Augment Code's main strength: deep contextual understanding leads to higher quality AI-generated code. Sourcegraph Cody's main strength: codebase context.