Boundary vs CyberArk Conjur: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Boundary and CyberArk Conjur side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Boundary
Securely access any system from anywhere based on user identity.
Best for you if:
- • You want enhances security by granting access based on user identity and role
CyberArk Conjur
Securely authenticate, control, and audit non-human access across your entire tech stack.
Best for you if:
- • You want a fully free tool (Boundary requires payment)
| At a Glance | ||
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan | Free 100% free |
Category | Security Identity & Access | Identity & Access Security |
Rating | n/a | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 17 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Choose Boundary or CyberArk Conjur?
Choose Boundary if
- You want enhances security by granting access based on user identity and role
- You want simplifies remote access to cloud and on-premise infrastructure
- You work in security, not identity & access
Choose CyberArk Conjur if
- You want a fully free tool (Boundary requires payment)
- You want eliminates hard-coded secrets from DevOps tools
- You want secures secrets in containerized and elastic environments
- You work in identity & access, not security
In-Depth Analysis
Boundary
Securely access any system from anywhere based on user identity.
Strengths
- Pro: Enhances security by granting access based on user identity and role.
- Pro: Simplifies remote access to cloud and on-premise infrastructure.
- Pro: Automates infrastructure onboarding with service discovery.
- Pro: Provides comprehensive audit trails and session visibility for compliance.
- Pro: Integrates with popular identity providers and HashiCorp Vault.
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires integration and configuration with existing identity providers and infrastructure.
- Con: Learning curve for new users, especially with advanced features like Vault integration.
Key features
CyberArk Conjur
Securely authenticate, control, and audit non-human access across your entire tech stack.
The pricing for CyberArk Conjur is exceptionally generous, offering a fully-featured Conjur OSS for free.
Strengths
- Pro: Eliminates hard-coded secrets from DevOps tools
- Pro: Secures secrets in containerized and elastic environments
- Pro: Provides a single source of truth for secrets, reducing sprawl
- Pro: Offers an open-source version for community-driven development and flexibility
- Pro: Supports seamless upgrade to an enterprise version for advanced needs
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires integration and configuration within existing DevOps workflows
- Con: The open-source version may lack some advanced features found in the enterprise offering
Key features
Plans and prices: Boundary vs CyberArk Conjur
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Boundary | No plan prices on file | boundaryproject.io |
| CyberArk Conjur |
| conjur.org/get-started read Oct 7, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Boundary pricing and CyberArk Conjur pricing.
Key Takeaways
Boundary
- Choose if you want securely access any system from anywhere based on user identity
CyberArk Conjur
- Choose if you want securely authenticate, control, and audit non-human access across your entire tech stack
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Only CyberArk Conjur has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 17 reviews); Boundary has none we can show.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Boundary and CyberArk Conjur compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only CyberArk Conjur has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 17 reviews); Boundary has none we can show. Both have a free plan.
What are Boundary and CyberArk Conjur used for?
Boundary: Securely access any system from anywhere based on user identity. CyberArk Conjur: Securely authenticate, control, and audit non-human access across your entire tech stack.
What does Boundary cost vs CyberArk Conjur?
Boundary has no public paid-plan price on file. CyberArk Conjur is free. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 7, 2026.
What's the main difference between Boundary and CyberArk Conjur?
Boundary's main strength: enhances security by granting access based on user identity and role. CyberArk Conjur's main strength: eliminates hard-coded secrets from DevOps tools.