Cognee vs Supermemory: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Cognee and Supermemory side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Supermemory leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Cognee
Build AI agents with persistent, structured graph memory
Best for you if:
- • You want provides durable, shared memory for AI agents, improving their consistency and intelligence
Supermemory
Give AI agents state-of-the-art, dynamic memory and context
Best for you if:
- • You want enables agents to have state-of-the-art, evolving memory beyond simple vector storage
| At a Glance | Cognee | Supermemory |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $35/mo, billed monthly Developer plan | Free plan, paid from $19/mo, billed monthly Pro plan |
Category | AI Agents Data & Databases | Data & Databases AI Agents |
Rating | n/a | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Usage overages beyond built-in amounts |
Choose Cognee or Supermemory?
Choose Cognee if
- You want provides durable, shared memory for AI agents, improving their consistency and intelligence
- You want supports a wide range of data sources and agent frameworks, offering flexibility
- You work in AI agents, not data & databases
Choose Supermemory if
- You want enables agents to have state-of-the-art, evolving memory beyond simple vector storage
- You want offers extremely low latency for context retrieval, crucial for real-time agent interactions
- Budget matters ($19/mo, billed monthly vs $35/mo, billed monthly)
- You work in data & databases, not AI agents
In-Depth Analysis
Cognee
Build AI agents with persistent, structured graph memory
Cognee's pricing is fair, offering a generous Free tier for basic experimentation.
Strengths
- Pro: Provides durable, shared memory for AI agents, improving their consistency and intelligence.
- Pro: Supports a wide range of data sources and agent frameworks, offering flexibility.
- Pro: Offers both open-source local development and scalable cloud/on-premise deployment options.
- Pro: Automatically generates and updates ontologies, keeping knowledge structures fresh.
- Pro: Ensures data security and compliance with options for private cloud or on-premise deployment.
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires integration and configuration with existing agent systems.
- Con: The complexity of graph memory and ontology management may have a learning curve for new users.
- Con: Scalability and advanced features are primarily available in paid tiers.
Key features
Supermemory
Give AI agents state-of-the-art, dynamic memory and context
Supermemory's pricing is generally fair, offering a generous free tier and clear progression.
Watch out
Usage overages beyond built-in amounts
Strengths
- Pro: Enables agents to have state-of-the-art, evolving memory beyond simple vector storage.
- Pro: Offers extremely low latency for context retrieval, crucial for real-time agent interactions.
- Pro: Simplifies context management with a single API for ingestion, retrieval, and memory.
- Pro: Provides robust data ingestion and extraction capabilities for various formats and sources.
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires technical expertise for integration and development of AI agents.
- Con: Pricing is usage-based, which can be unpredictable for very high-volume applications without careful monitoring.
Key features
Plans and prices: Cognee vs Supermemory
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cognee |
| cognee.ai/pricing read Oct 27, 2026 |
| Supermemory |
| supermemory.ai/pricing read Oct 27, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Cognee pricing and Supermemory pricing.
Key Takeaways
Cognee
- Choose if you want build AI agents with persistent, structured graph memory
Supermemory
- Lower entry price: $19/mo, billed monthly vs $35/mo, billed monthly
What the data shows
On the data below, Supermemory leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Supermemory has the lower entry price: $19/mo, billed monthly (Pro) against $35/mo, billed monthly (Developer) for Cognee.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Cognee and Supermemory compare in 2026?
On the data below, Supermemory leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Supermemory has the lower entry price: $19/mo, billed monthly (Pro) against $35/mo, billed monthly (Developer) for Cognee. Both have a free plan.
What are Cognee and Supermemory used for?
Cognee: Build AI agents with persistent, structured graph memory. Supermemory: Give AI agents state-of-the-art, dynamic memory and context.
What does Cognee cost vs Supermemory?
Cognee's cheapest paid plan is Developer at $35/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Supermemory's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $19/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 27, 2026.
What's the main difference between Cognee and Supermemory?
Cognee's main strength: provides durable, shared memory for AI agents, improving their consistency and intelligence. Supermemory's main strength: enables agents to have state-of-the-art, evolving memory beyond simple vector storage.