Cyclic vs Zeabur: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Cyclic and Zeabur side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Cyclic leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Cyclic
Deploy and host fullstack JavaScript apps in seconds with a Git push, leveraging serverless AWS infrastructure.
Best for you if:
- • You want extremely fast deployment (under 10 seconds)
Zeabur
Your AI DevOps Engineer handling all your infrastructure needs, so you can focus on coding.
Best for you if:
- • You want simple deployment
| At a Glance | Cyclic | Zeabur |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $3/mo, billed monthly App Environments plan | Free plan, paid from $5/mo, billed monthly Developer plan |
Category | Hosting & Deployment CI/CD | Hosting & Deployment DevOps |
Rating | n/a | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | No clear pricing for additional storage/database usage. | Overage fees beyond included credits |
Choose Cyclic or Zeabur?
Choose Cyclic if
- You want extremely fast deployment (under 10 seconds)
- You want generous free tier with no inactivity delay and useful quotas
- Budget matters ($3/mo, billed monthly vs $5/mo, billed monthly)
Choose Zeabur if
- You want simple deployment
- You want good DX
In-Depth Analysis
Cyclic
Deploy and host fullstack JavaScript apps in seconds with a Git push, leveraging serverless AWS infrastructure.
Cyclic offers a very generous free tier, making it highly accessible for individual developers and small projects.
Watch out
No clear pricing for additional storage/database usage.
Strengths
- Pro: Extremely fast deployment (under 10 seconds)
- Pro: Generous free tier with no inactivity delay and useful quotas
- Pro: Simplifies serverless deployment by abstracting AWS complexities
- Pro: Automatic scaling and global distribution for high performance
- Pro: Built-in CI/CD for easy version management
Weaknesses
- Con: Usage-based pricing can be unpredictable beyond free tier quotas
- Con: Primarily focused on JavaScript/TypeScript, though expanding to Python/Go (Beta)
- Con: Enterprise features like BYO Cloud Account require custom quotes
Key features
Zeabur
Your AI DevOps Engineer handling all your infrastructure needs, so you can focus on coding.
Zeabur's pricing is quite generous, especially with the Serverless tier offering a $5 monthly credit, effectively making basic usage free.
Watch out
Overage fees beyond included credits
Strengths
- Pro: Simple deployment
- Pro: Good DX
- Pro: Fair pricing
- Pro: Active development
- Pro: Good for side projects
Weaknesses
- Con: Newer platform
- Con: Limited features
- Con: Smaller community
- Con: Documentation improving
- Con: Still maturing
Key features
Plans and prices: Cyclic vs Zeabur
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclic |
| cyclic.sh/pricing read Oct 7, 2026 |
| Zeabur |
| zeabur.com/pricing read Oct 20, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Cyclic pricing and Zeabur pricing.
Key Takeaways
Cyclic
- Lower entry price: $3/mo, billed monthly vs $5/mo, billed monthly
Zeabur
- Choose if you want your AI DevOps Engineer handling all your infrastructure needs, so you can focus on coding
What the data shows
On the data below, Cyclic leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Cyclic has the lower entry price: $3/mo, billed monthly (App Environments) against $5/mo, billed monthly (Developer) for Zeabur.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Cyclic and Zeabur compare in 2026?
On the data below, Cyclic leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Cyclic has the lower entry price: $3/mo, billed monthly (App Environments) against $5/mo, billed monthly (Developer) for Zeabur. Both have a free plan.
What are Cyclic and Zeabur used for?
Cyclic: Deploy and host fullstack JavaScript apps in seconds with a Git push, leveraging serverless AWS infrastructure. Zeabur: Your AI DevOps Engineer handling all your infrastructure needs, so you can focus on coding.
What does Cyclic cost vs Zeabur?
Cyclic's cheapest paid plan is App Environments at $3/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Zeabur's cheapest paid plan is Developer at $5/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 20, 2026.
What's the main difference between Cyclic and Zeabur?
Cyclic's main strength: extremely fast deployment (under 10 seconds). Zeabur's main strength: simple deployment.