Cyclr vs Tines: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Cyclr and Tines side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Tines leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Cyclr
Embed native integrations and orchestrate AI workflows within your SaaS product.
Best for you if:
- • You want accelerates integration delivery and reduces development overhead for SaaS companies
Tines
Securely scale AI and automation by integrating agents, teams, and tools with speed and control.
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Cyclr | Tines |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Not published | Free plan |
Category | Workflow Automation AI Agents | Workflow Automation No-Code |
Rating | 4.7/5 G2 4.7 · Capterra 4.8 94 reviews | 4.7/5 G2 4.7 429 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | Overage fees for API calls beyond included limits | Overage fees for exceeding event limits |
Choose Cyclr or Tines?
Choose Cyclr if
- You want accelerates integration delivery and reduces development overhead for SaaS companies
- You want enables seamless, in-app integrations for a superior customer experience
Choose Tines if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want highly flexible and customizable, adapting to specific organizational needs
- You want user-friendly interface, making it accessible for non-developers
In-Depth Analysis
Cyclr
Embed native integrations and orchestrate AI workflows within your SaaS product.
Cyclr's pricing is on the expensive side, especially for smaller businesses, with the 'Native Embedded iPaaS - PAYG' starting at $1,595/month for only 100,000 API calls.
Watch out
Overage fees for API calls beyond included limits
Strengths
- Pro: Accelerates integration delivery and reduces development overhead for SaaS companies.
- Pro: Enables seamless, in-app integrations for a superior customer experience.
- Pro: Supports AI integration and agentic workflows, future-proofing products.
- Pro: Offers a vast library of pre-built connectors and tools for custom connector creation.
- Pro: Provides robust security and multi-tenancy for scalable and secure operations.
Weaknesses
- Con: Pricing starts at a relatively high monthly cost, potentially limiting smaller businesses.
- Con: Depth of features might have a learning curve for new users, despite low-code tools.
Key features
Tines
Securely scale AI and automation by integrating agents, teams, and tools with speed and control.
Tines offers a generous free Community Edition, providing significant value for small teams or individuals exploring automation with 3 builders and 5000 daily events.
Watch out
Overage fees for exceeding event limits
Strengths
- Pro: Highly flexible and customizable, adapting to specific organizational needs.
- Pro: User-friendly interface, making it accessible for non-developers.
- Pro: Significant time savings and reduction in manual work.
- Pro: Strong focus on security with built-in governance and monitoring.
- Pro: Excellent customer support, often cited as a benchmark by users.
Weaknesses
- Con: No specific cons were mentioned in the provided text.
Key features
Plans and prices: Cyclr vs Tines
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclr |
| cyclr.com/pricing read Oct 15, 2026 |
| Tines |
| tines.com/pricing read Sep 30, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Cyclr pricing and Tines pricing.
Key Takeaways
Cyclr
- Choose if you want embed native integrations and orchestrate AI workflows within your SaaS product
Tines
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Tines leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.7/5 from 94 reviews for Cyclr, 4.7/5 from 429 reviews for Tines).
- Only Tines has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Cyclr and Tines compare in 2026?
On the data below, Tines leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.7/5 from 94 reviews for Cyclr, 4.7/5 from 429 reviews for Tines). Only Tines has a free plan.
What are Cyclr and Tines used for?
Cyclr: Embed native integrations and orchestrate AI workflows within your SaaS product. Tines: Securely scale AI and automation by integrating agents, teams, and tools with speed and control.
What does Cyclr cost vs Tines?
Cyclr has no public paid-plan price on file. Tines has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 15, 2026.
What's the main difference between Cyclr and Tines?
Cyclr's main strength: accelerates integration delivery and reduces development overhead for SaaS companies. Tines's main strength: highly flexible and customizable, adapting to specific organizational needs.