Dust vs eza: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Dust and eza side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Dust
An intuitive command-line tool for visualizing disk usage in Rust.
Best for you if:
- • You want more intuitive and visually appealing than 'du'
eza
A modern, feature-rich command-line file lister for Unix and Linux systems.
Best for you if:
- • You want more feature-rich than the traditional 'ls' command
| At a Glance | Dust | eza |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free 100% free | Free 100% free |
Category | Terminal Tools Developer Tools | Terminal Tools File Management |
Rating | n/a | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Choose Dust or eza?
Choose Dust if
- You want more intuitive and visually appealing than 'du'
- You want quickly identifies disk space hogs
Choose eza if
- You want more feature-rich than the traditional 'ls' command
- You want improved user experience with better defaults and visual cues
In-Depth Analysis
Dust
An intuitive command-line tool for visualizing disk usage in Rust.
Dust's pricing is exceptionally generous, as it is entirely free and open-source.
Strengths
- Pro: More intuitive and visually appealing than 'du'
- Pro: Quickly identifies disk space hogs
- Pro: No need for additional sorting or filtering commands
- Pro: Highly configurable with numerous options
- Pro: Available on multiple platforms (Cargo, Homebrew, Snap, Anaconda, Scoop, etc.)
Weaknesses
- Con: Snap version has limited file access (only /home directory)
- Con: Requires Rust for compilation if not using pre-built binaries
Key features
eza
A modern, feature-rich command-line file lister for Unix and Linux systems.
Strengths
- Pro: More feature-rich than the traditional 'ls' command
- Pro: Improved user experience with better defaults and visual cues
- Pro: Fast and lightweight due to being written in Rust
- Pro: Actively maintained with ongoing bug fixes and improvements
- Pro: Wide availability across various operating systems and package managers
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires installation as it's not a default system utility
- Con: Command-line options are similar but not identical to 'ls', requiring a slight learning curve for some users
Key features
Plans and prices: Dust vs eza
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Dust |
| github.com/bootandy/dust read Oct 27, 2026 |
| eza | No plan prices on file | eza.rocks |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Dust pricing and eza pricing.
Key Takeaways
Dust
- Choose if you want an intuitive command-line tool for visualizing disk usage in Rust
eza
- Choose if you want a modern, feature-rich command-line file lister for Unix and Linux systems
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Dust and eza compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Both have a free plan.
What are Dust and eza used for?
Dust: An intuitive command-line tool for visualizing disk usage in Rust. eza: A modern, feature-rich command-line file lister for Unix and Linux systems.
What does Dust cost vs eza?
Dust is free. eza is free. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 27, 2026.
What's the main difference between Dust and eza?
Dust's main strength: more intuitive and visually appealing than 'du'. eza's main strength: more feature-rich than the traditional 'ls' command.