Earthly vs Snyk: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Earthly and Snyk side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Snyk leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Earthly
Automate engineering standards enforcement across every tool, team, and deployment.
Best for you if:
- • You want ensures consistent application of engineering standards and compliance automatically
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Best for you if:
- • You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
| At a Glance | Earthly | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Not published | Free plan, paid from $25/mo flat, billed monthly Team plan |
Category | Security DevOps | Security Testing & QA |
Rating | n/a | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 157 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Watch out for | n/a | Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines |
Choose Earthly or Snyk?
Choose Earthly if
- You want ensures consistent application of engineering standards and compliance automatically
- You want significantly reduces build times and improves build reliability
Choose Snyk if
- You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- You want broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
In-Depth Analysis
Earthly
Automate engineering standards enforcement across every tool, team, and deployment.
Strengths
- Pro: Ensures consistent application of engineering standards and compliance automatically.
- Pro: Significantly reduces build times and improves build reliability.
- Pro: Provides clear visibility into standards adherence across the organization.
- Pro: Integrates seamlessly with existing CI/CD tools and complements policy tools like OPA.
- Pro: Empowers developers with instant feedback and proactive guidance, reducing last-minute blockers.
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires initial setup to define and codify standards.
- Con: The learning curve for Earthfiles syntax, though familiar, might exist for new users.
Key features
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Snyk Free is usable for individual developers but test limits are tight (200 SCA, 100 SAST, 100 container tests/month).
Watch out
Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines
Strengths
- Pro: Developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- Pro: Broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
- Pro: Automated fix pull requests save significant remediation time
- Pro: Generous free tier with 200 open-source and 100 code tests per month
- Pro: AI-powered prioritization focuses teams on the most exploitable vulnerabilities first
Weaknesses
- Con: Team plan limited to 10 developers per organization, requiring Ignite for larger teams
- Con: Ignite tier at $1,260/year per developer is expensive for mid-size teams
- Con: DAST scanning limited to 10 targets even on Ignite plan
- Con: Advanced features like custom rules and SSO only available on Ignite and above
- Con: Can produce noisy results on large monorepos without careful policy tuning
Key features
Plans and prices: Earthly vs Snyk
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Earthly | No plan prices on file | earthly.dev/pricing |
| Snyk |
| snyk.io/plans read Nov 2, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Earthly pricing and Snyk pricing.
Key Takeaways
Earthly
- Choose if you want automate engineering standards enforcement across every tool, team, and deployment
Snyk
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Snyk leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Snyk has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 157 reviews); Earthly has none we can show.
- Snyk starts at $25/mo flat, billed monthly; Earthly has no public paid plan price on file.
- Only Snyk has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Earthly and Snyk compare in 2026?
On the data below, Snyk leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Snyk has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 157 reviews); Earthly has none we can show. Snyk starts at $25/mo flat, billed monthly; Earthly has no public paid plan price on file. Only Snyk has a free plan.
What are Earthly and Snyk used for?
Earthly: Automate engineering standards enforcement across every tool, team, and deployment. Snyk: Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production.
What does Earthly cost vs Snyk?
Earthly has no public paid-plan price on file. Snyk's cheapest paid plan is Team at $25/mo flat, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Earthly and Snyk?
Earthly's main strength: ensures consistent application of engineering standards and compliance automatically. Snyk's main strength: developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests.