Fork vs Sourcetree: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Fork and Sourcetree side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Sourcetree leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Fork
Fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
Best for you if:
- • You want good Git client
Sourcetree
Visualize and manage Git and Mercurial repos without the command line
Best for you if:
- • You want a fully free tool (Fork requires payment)
| At a Glance | Fork | Sourcetree |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Not published | Free 100% free |
Category | Version Control Developer Tools | Version Control Developer Tools |
Rating | n/a | 4.4/5 G2 4.3 · Capterra 4.7 401 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Choose Fork or Sourcetree?
Choose Fork if
- You want good Git client
- You want fast and light
Choose Sourcetree if
- You want a fully free tool (Fork requires payment)
- You want completely free
- You want visual interface
In-Depth Analysis
Fork
Fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
Fork's one-time purchase of $49.99 for a perpetual license is fair and generous compared to many subscription-based Git clients.
Strengths
- Pro: Good Git client
- Pro: Fast and light
- Pro: Fair pricing
- Pro: Good features
- Pro: Active development
Weaknesses
- Con: Less known
- Con: Feature gaps
- Con: Better alternatives exist
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Support varies
Key features
Sourcetree
Visualize and manage Git and Mercurial repos without the command line
Sourcetree's pricing is exceptionally generous, as it is completely free ($0) for all users, offering a full-featured Git GUI client without any hidden costs or feature limitations.
Strengths
- Pro: Completely free
- Pro: Visual interface
- Pro: Easy for beginners
Weaknesses
- Con: Can be slow
Key features
Plans and prices: Fork vs Sourcetree
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Fork |
| git-fork.com read Oct 27, 2026 |
| Sourcetree |
| sourcetreeapp.com read Oct 31, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Fork pricing and Sourcetree pricing.
Key Takeaways
Fork
- Choose if you want fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
Sourcetree
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Sourcetree leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Sourcetree has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 401 reviews); Fork has none we can show.
- Only Sourcetree has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Fork and Sourcetree compare in 2026?
On the data below, Sourcetree leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Sourcetree has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 401 reviews); Fork has none we can show. Only Sourcetree has a free plan.
What are Fork and Sourcetree used for?
Fork: Fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows. Sourcetree: Visualize and manage Git and Mercurial repos without the command line.
What does Fork cost vs Sourcetree?
Fork has no public paid-plan price on file. Sourcetree is free. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between Fork and Sourcetree?
Fork's main strength: good Git client. Sourcetree's main strength: completely free.