FOSSA vs Snyk: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for FOSSA and Snyk side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Snyk leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
FOSSA
Control your software supply chain with automated open source security, compliance, and quality management.
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Best for you if:
- • You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
| At a Glance | FOSSA | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $207/mo, billed monthly Business plan | Free plan, paid from $25/mo flat, billed monthly Team plan |
Category | Security DevOps | Security Testing & QA |
Rating | 4.3/5 PeerSpot 4.3 · G2 4.2 30 reviews | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 157 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | No |
Watch out for | n/a | Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines |
Choose FOSSA or Snyk?
Choose FOSSA if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want comprehensive scanning capabilities (packages, containers, binaries, snippets)
- You want automated compliance and security features save time and reduce risk
Choose Snyk if
- You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- You want broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
In-Depth Analysis
FOSSA
Control your software supply chain with automated open source security, compliance, and quality management.
FOSSA's pricing structure is somewhat opaque and potentially expensive for growing teams.
Strengths
- Pro: Comprehensive scanning capabilities (packages, containers, binaries, snippets)
- Pro: Automated compliance and security features save time and reduce risk
- Pro: AI agent (fossabot) intelligently reviews dependency updates, reducing manual effort
- Pro: Supports all major languages, frameworks, and CI/CD runtimes
- Pro: Offers a free plan for individuals and small teams
Weaknesses
- Con: Pricing for advanced features can scale with contributing developers, potentially increasing cost for larger teams
- Con: Specific details on integration with various CI/CD tools are not explicitly detailed on the main page
Key features
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Snyk Free is usable for individual developers but test limits are tight (200 SCA, 100 SAST, 100 container tests/month).
Watch out
Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines
Strengths
- Pro: Developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- Pro: Broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
- Pro: Automated fix pull requests save significant remediation time
- Pro: Generous free tier with 200 open-source and 100 code tests per month
- Pro: AI-powered prioritization focuses teams on the most exploitable vulnerabilities first
Weaknesses
- Con: Team plan limited to 10 developers per organization, requiring Ignite for larger teams
- Con: Ignite tier at $1,260/year per developer is expensive for mid-size teams
- Con: DAST scanning limited to 10 targets even on Ignite plan
- Con: Advanced features like custom rules and SSO only available on Ignite and above
- Con: Can produce noisy results on large monorepos without careful policy tuning
Key features
Plans and prices: FOSSA vs Snyk
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| FOSSA |
| fossa.com/pricing read Nov 2, 2026 |
| Snyk |
| snyk.io/plans read Nov 2, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on FOSSA pricing and Snyk pricing.
Key Takeaways
FOSSA
- Choose if you want control your software supply chain with automated open source security, compliance, and quality management
Snyk
- Higher user rating: 4.5/5 vs 4.3/5
What the data shows
On the data below, Snyk leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Snyk has the higher user rating (4.3/5 from 30 reviews for FOSSA, 4.5/5 from 157 reviews for Snyk).
- Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: FOSSA $207/mo, billed monthly; Snyk $25/mo flat, billed monthly.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do FOSSA and Snyk compare in 2026?
On the data below, Snyk leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Snyk has the higher user rating (4.3/5 from 30 reviews for FOSSA, 4.5/5 from 157 reviews for Snyk). Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: FOSSA $207/mo, billed monthly; Snyk $25/mo flat, billed monthly. Both have a free plan.
What are FOSSA and Snyk used for?
FOSSA: Control your software supply chain with automated open source security, compliance, and quality management. Snyk: Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production.
What does FOSSA cost vs Snyk?
FOSSA's cheapest paid plan is Business at $207/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Snyk's cheapest paid plan is Team at $25/mo flat, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between FOSSA and Snyk?
FOSSA's main strength: comprehensive scanning capabilities (packages, containers, binaries, snippets). Snyk's main strength: developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests.