FreightView vs Manhattan Associates: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for FreightView and Manhattan Associates side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, FreightView leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
FreightView
Streamline freight shipping by comparing rates, booking, tracking, and managing all in one platform.
Best for you if:
- • You want centralized platform for comparing rates across various carriers and shipment types
Manhattan Associates
Unified supply chain and commerce solutions for planning, selling, shipping, and delivery.
Best for you if:
- • You want unified platform simplifies complex supply chain and commerce operations
| At a Glance | FreightView | Manhattan Associates |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $149/mo, billed monthly 0-50 ships per month plan | Not published |
Category | Shipping & Fulfillment Supply Chain | Logistics & Operations Supply Chain |
Rating | 4.7/5 Capterra 4.7 · G2 4.7 938 reviews | 4.2/5 SourceForge 4.3 · G2 4.0 80 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Choose FreightView or Manhattan Associates?
Choose FreightView if
- You want centralized platform for comparing rates across various carriers and shipment types
- You want automates many manual shipping tasks like quoting, tracking, and document generation
- You work in shipping & fulfillment, not logistics & operations
Choose Manhattan Associates if
- You want unified platform simplifies complex supply chain and commerce operations
- You want cloud-native and microservices architecture ensures continuous updates and scalability
- You work in logistics & operations, not shipping & fulfillment
In-Depth Analysis
FreightView
Streamline freight shipping by comparing rates, booking, tracking, and managing all in one platform.
FreightView's pricing for the lowest tier at $149/month for 0-50 shipments is quite high, especially for businesses with very low shipping volumes.
Strengths
- Pro: Centralized platform for comparing rates across various carriers and shipment types.
- Pro: Automates many manual shipping tasks like quoting, tracking, and document generation.
- Pro: Provides analytics and invoice auditing to help optimize shipping costs.
- Pro: Supports complex shipping scenarios including multi-stop and hazardous materials.
- Pro: Offers a 14-day free trial without requiring upfront payment information.
Weaknesses
- Con: Pricing for higher shipment volumes requires direct contact, lacking transparent tiered pricing.
- Con: No free tier available after the trial period.
Key features
Manhattan Associates
Unified supply chain and commerce solutions for planning, selling, shipping, and delivery.
Strengths
- Pro: Unified platform simplifies complex supply chain and commerce operations.
- Pro: Cloud-native and microservices architecture ensures continuous updates and scalability.
- Pro: Advanced AI and machine learning drive intelligent decision-making and optimization.
- Pro: Enhances customer experience through omnichannel capabilities.
- Pro: Proven track record with leading global brands.
Weaknesses
- Con: No pricing information publicly available, suggesting it's an enterprise-level solution.
- Con: Implementation might be complex for smaller businesses.
- Con: Requires integration with existing systems, which can be a hurdle.
Key features
Plans and prices: FreightView vs Manhattan Associates
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| FreightView |
| freightview.com/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
| Manhattan Associates | No plan prices on file | manh.com |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on FreightView pricing and Manhattan Associates pricing.
Key Takeaways
FreightView
- Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.2/5
Manhattan Associates
- Choose if you want unified supply chain and commerce solutions for planning, selling, shipping, and delivery
What the data shows
On the data below, FreightView leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- FreightView has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 938 reviews for FreightView, 4.2/5 from 80 reviews for Manhattan Associates).
- FreightView starts at $149/mo, billed monthly; Manhattan Associates has no public paid plan price on file.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do FreightView and Manhattan Associates compare in 2026?
On the data below, FreightView leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. FreightView has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 938 reviews for FreightView, 4.2/5 from 80 reviews for Manhattan Associates). FreightView starts at $149/mo, billed monthly; Manhattan Associates has no public paid plan price on file.
What are FreightView and Manhattan Associates used for?
FreightView: Streamline freight shipping by comparing rates, booking, tracking, and managing all in one platform. Manhattan Associates: Unified supply chain and commerce solutions for planning, selling, shipping, and delivery.
What does FreightView cost vs Manhattan Associates?
FreightView's cheapest paid plan is 0-50 ships per month at $149/mo, billed monthly. Manhattan Associates has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between FreightView and Manhattan Associates?
FreightView's main strength: centralized platform for comparing rates across various carriers and shipment types. Manhattan Associates's main strength: unified platform simplifies complex supply chain and commerce operations.