Jobber vs WorkWave: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Jobber and WorkWave side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Jobber leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Jobber
Streamline operations, win more jobs, and boost profits for home and commercial service businesses.
Best for you if:
- • You want saves an average of 12+ hours per week for users
WorkWave
Automate and optimize field service operations for growth and efficiency.
Best for you if:
- • You want tailored solutions for specific field service industries (lawn care, pest control, cleaning, security)
| At a Glance | Jobber | WorkWave |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $39/mo, billed monthly Core plan | Not published |
Category | CRM Field Management | CRM Invoicing |
Rating | 4.3/5 Trustpilot 4.1 · G2 4.6 1,101 reviews | 4.1/5 Capterra 4.3 · G2 3.8 24 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Choose Jobber or WorkWave?
Choose Jobber if
- You want saves an average of 12+ hours per week for users
- You want helps businesses achieve an average of 44% revenue growth in the first year
Choose WorkWave if
- You want tailored solutions for specific field service industries (lawn care, pest control, cleaning, security)
- You want scalable platform designed to grow with businesses
In-Depth Analysis
Jobber
Streamline operations, win more jobs, and boost profits for home and commercial service businesses.
Jobber's pricing is on the higher side for small service businesses, with the Core tier starting at $39/month offering basic functionality.
Strengths
- Pro: Saves an average of 12+ hours per week for users
- Pro: Helps businesses achieve an average of 44% revenue growth in the first year
- Pro: Consolidates multiple business functions into one platform
- Pro: Improves customer satisfaction through efficient service and communication
- Pro: Offers marketing tools to attract new clients and secure repeat business
Weaknesses
- Con: The per-user pricing model scales steeply for growing crews, with each additional user costing a significant amount and the total bill often pushing past a high threshold once you add team seats, payment processing fees, and paid add-ons like the AI Receptionist and Marketing Suite.
- Con: The QuickBooks integration is Jobber's most frequently cited complaint across review sites and Reddit, with users reporting sync errors, duplicate entries, and broken connections, and the sync is one-way into QuickBooks Online with no QuickBooks Desktop support.
- Con: Reporting is shallow, with no custom report builder, no revenue forecasting, and no real-time tracking of material costs against estimates, so businesses needing deep analytics have to export data or use another tool.
- Con: Higher-value features like two-way SMS client texting and team productivity reporting are locked behind the pricier Grow tier, forcing smaller businesses to upgrade to a much more expensive plan just to unlock basic communication and reporting.
Key features
WorkWave
Automate and optimize field service operations for growth and efficiency.
Strengths
- Pro: Tailored solutions for specific field service industries (lawn care, pest control, cleaning, security).
- Pro: Scalable platform designed to grow with businesses.
- Pro: Integration of AI and fintech for advanced operational capabilities.
- Pro: Comprehensive suite of tools covering various aspects of business management.
- Pro: Proven track record with over 40 years of industry experience.
Weaknesses
- Con: Specific pricing details are not publicly available.
- Con: Requires implementation and training for full utilization of its extensive features.
Key features
Plans and prices: Jobber vs WorkWave
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Jobber |
| getjobber.com/pricing read Oct 2, 2026 |
| WorkWave | No plan prices on file | workwave.com |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Jobber pricing and WorkWave pricing.
Key Takeaways
Jobber
- Higher user rating: 4.3/5 vs 4.1/5
WorkWave
- Choose if you want automate and optimize field service operations for growth and efficiency
What the data shows
On the data below, Jobber leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Jobber has the higher user rating (4.3/5 from 1,101 reviews for Jobber, 4.1/5 from 24 reviews for WorkWave).
- Jobber starts at $39/mo, billed monthly; WorkWave has no public paid plan price on file.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Jobber and WorkWave compare in 2026?
On the data below, Jobber leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Jobber has the higher user rating (4.3/5 from 1,101 reviews for Jobber, 4.1/5 from 24 reviews for WorkWave). Jobber starts at $39/mo, billed monthly; WorkWave has no public paid plan price on file.
What are Jobber and WorkWave used for?
Jobber: Streamline operations, win more jobs, and boost profits for home and commercial service businesses. WorkWave: Automate and optimize field service operations for growth and efficiency.
What does Jobber cost vs WorkWave?
Jobber's cheapest paid plan is Core at $39/mo, billed monthly. WorkWave has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Jobber and WorkWave?
Jobber's main strength: saves an average of 12+ hours per week for users. WorkWave's main strength: tailored solutions for specific field service industries (lawn care, pest control, cleaning, security).