Joplin vs .MD This Page: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Joplin and .MD This Page side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Joplin leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Joplin
Capture your thoughts and securely access them from any device with this open-source note-taking app.
Best for you if:
- • You want open-source and ensures data ownership in an open format
.MD This Page
Convert any web page to clean, readable Markdown with just one click.
Best for you if:
- • You want significantly reduces noise for LLM processing, improving accuracy and efficiency
| At a Glance | Joplin | .MD This Page |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $3.22/mo, billed monthly Basic plan | Free plan, paid from $4/user/mo, billed monthly Team plan |
Category | Note-Taking Productivity | Read Later Writing Apps |
Rating | 4.4/5 SourceForge 4.3 · G2 4.8 · Trustpilot 3.7 73 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Packages storage beyond free limits |
Choose Joplin or .MD This Page?
Choose Joplin if
- You want open-source and ensures data ownership in an open format
- You want strong emphasis on privacy with End-To-End Encryption (E2EE)
- Budget matters ($3.22/mo, billed monthly vs $4/user/mo, billed monthly)
- You work in note-taking, not read later
Choose .MD This Page if
- You want significantly reduces noise for LLM processing, improving accuracy and efficiency
- You want preserves structural elements like headings and lists for better content understanding
- You work in read later, not note-taking
In-Depth Analysis
Joplin
Capture your thoughts and securely access them from any device with this open-source note-taking app.
Joplin's pricing is fair, especially for individual users.
Strengths
- Pro: Open-source and ensures data ownership in an open format.
- Pro: Strong emphasis on privacy with End-To-End Encryption (E2EE).
- Pro: Highly customizable with plugins, themes, and API.
- Pro: Available across a wide range of platforms (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, Terminal).
- Pro: Supports multimedia content and web clipping for comprehensive note-taking.
Weaknesses
- Con: E2EE setup requires manual enabling on each device.
- Con: Initial E2EE sync can be time-consuming for large note collections.
- Con: Advanced collaboration and sharing features are tied to paid Joplin Cloud plans.
Key features
.MD This Page
Convert any web page to clean, readable Markdown with just one click.
The pricing for .MD This Page is quite generous, especially with a robust free tier that includes GitHub Copilot and Codespaces access.
Watch out
Packages storage beyond free limits
Strengths
- Pro: Significantly reduces noise for LLM processing, improving accuracy and efficiency.
- Pro: Preserves structural elements like headings and lists for better content understanding.
- Pro: More token-efficient than raw HTML for LLM context windows.
- Pro: Easy to use with one-click functionality and keyboard shortcut.
- Pro: Customizable output allows users to tailor Markdown to specific needs.
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires manual installation from releases or building from source (not available in official browser stores yet).
- Con: Relies on Mozilla's Readability, which might not perfectly extract content from all complex page layouts.
- Con: No direct integration with LLM platforms, requires manual copying/pasting for AI workflows.
Key features
Plans and prices: Joplin vs .MD This Page
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Joplin |
| joplinapp.org/plans read Oct 28, 2026 |
| .MD This Page |
| github.com/pricing read Oct 25, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Joplin pricing and .MD This Page pricing.
Key Takeaways
Joplin
- Lower entry price: $3.22/mo, billed monthly vs $4/user/mo, billed monthly
.MD This Page
- Choose if you want convert any web page to clean, readable Markdown with just one click
What the data shows
On the data below, Joplin leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Joplin has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 73 reviews); .MD This Page has none we can show.
- Joplin has the lower entry price: $3.22/mo, billed monthly (Basic) against $4/user/mo, billed monthly (Team) for .MD This Page.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Joplin and .MD This Page compare in 2026?
On the data below, Joplin leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Joplin has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 73 reviews); .MD This Page has none we can show. Joplin has the lower entry price: $3.22/mo, billed monthly (Basic) against $4/user/mo, billed monthly (Team) for .MD This Page. Both have a free plan.
What are Joplin and .MD This Page used for?
Joplin: Capture your thoughts and securely access them from any device with this open-source note-taking app. .MD This Page: Convert any web page to clean, readable Markdown with just one click.
What does Joplin cost vs .MD This Page?
Joplin's cheapest paid plan is Basic at $3.22/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. .MD This Page's cheapest paid plan is Team at $4/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 28, 2026.
What's the main difference between Joplin and .MD This Page?
Joplin's main strength: open-source and ensures data ownership in an open format. .MD This Page's main strength: significantly reduces noise for LLM processing, improving accuracy and efficiency.