Skip to content

Kitty vs TrackNotch: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)

Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Kitty and TrackNotch side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.

On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

Data comparison compiled by Toolradar, not hand-reviewed Methodology
Data comparison Pricing checked Oct 21, 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:

Kitty

The fast, feature-rich, GPU-based terminal emulator for power users.

Best for you if:

  • • You want a fully free tool (TrackNotch requires payment)

TrackNotch

Monitor your LLM usage directly in your Mac's notch

Best for you if:

  • • You want ensures privacy with local-first data processing and no telemetry
At a glance: Kitty vs TrackNotch
At a Glance
Kitty Kitty
TrackNotch TrackNotch
Starts at
Free 100% free
Free plan, paid from $4/user/mo, billed monthly Team plan
Category
Terminal Tools Developer Tools
Productivity Developer Tools
Rating
n/a n/a
Free plan
Yes Yes
Watch out for
n/a Potential overage fees for CI/CD minutes

Choose Kitty or TrackNotch?

Kitty

Choose Kitty if

  • You want a fully free tool (TrackNotch requires payment)
  • You want fast GPU-accelerated terminal
  • You want built-in tabs, splits, multiplexing
  • You work in terminal tools, not productivity
TrackNotch

Choose TrackNotch if

  • You want ensures privacy with local-first data processing and no telemetry
  • You want supports a wide range of popular LLM providers
  • You work in productivity, not terminal tools

In-Depth Analysis

Kitty Kitty

The fast, feature-rich, GPU-based terminal emulator for power users.

Great value

Kitty's pricing is exceptionally generous, as it is entirely free and open-source.

Strengths

  • Pro: Fast GPU-accelerated terminal
  • Pro: Built-in tabs, splits, multiplexing
  • Pro: Image rendering support
  • Pro: Highly configurable
  • Pro: Cross-platform

Weaknesses

  • Con: Configuration file-based only
  • Con: Documentation can be dense
  • Con: Learning curve
  • Con: Some compatibility issues
  • Con: Font rendering varies

Key features

GPU-accelerated terminal Extensible with Python Image support Ligatures Multiple layouts Cross-platform

TrackNotch TrackNotch

Monitor your LLM usage directly in your Mac's notch

Good value

The pricing for TrackNotch appears to be fair, especially with a generous Free tier.

Watch out

Potential overage fees for CI/CD minutes

Strengths

  • Pro: Ensures privacy with local-first data processing and no telemetry
  • Pro: Supports a wide range of popular LLM providers
  • Pro: Provides visual and numerical insights into LLM usage and spend
  • Pro: Securely stores API keys in macOS Keychain
  • Pro: Works on both notched and non-notched Macs

Weaknesses

  • Con: Requires manual installation steps due to unsigned build (though notarization is planned)
  • Con: Anthropic API and OpenAI API cost tracking require admin-level keys
  • Con: Currently only available for macOS 13 (Ventura) or later

Key features

Local-first usage tracking Multi-provider support (Claude, OpenAI, Cursor, Codex, Anthropic API, Google Gemini) Context arc visualization for Claude sessions Monthly budget tracking for OpenAI and Anthropic API Real-time rate-limit data via OAuth tokens for Claude Notch-native display with menu bar fallback

Plans and prices: Kitty vs TrackNotch

Plans and prices of Kitty and TrackNotch, as read on each vendor's pricing page. Each plan keeps its own billing unit.
Tool Plans and prices Source
Kitty
  • Free: Free
sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty read Sep 30, 2026
TrackNotch
  • Free: Free
  • Team: $4/user/mo, billed monthly
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing
github.com/pricing read Oct 21, 2026

Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Kitty pricing and TrackNotch pricing.

Key Takeaways

Kitty

  • Choose if you want the fast, feature-rich, GPU-based terminal emulator for power users

TrackNotch

  • Choose if you want monitor your LLM usage directly in your Mac's notch

What the data shows

On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

  • TrackNotch starts at $4/user/mo, billed monthly; Kitty has no public paid plan price on file.
  • Both have a free plan.

Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate

Frequently Asked Questions

How do Kitty and TrackNotch compare in 2026?

On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. TrackNotch starts at $4/user/mo, billed monthly; Kitty has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.

What are Kitty and TrackNotch used for?

Kitty: The fast, feature-rich, GPU-based terminal emulator for power users. TrackNotch: Monitor your LLM usage directly in your Mac's notch.

What does Kitty cost vs TrackNotch?

Kitty is free. TrackNotch's cheapest paid plan is Team at $4/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 21, 2026.

What's the main difference between Kitty and TrackNotch?

Kitty's main strength: fast GPU-accelerated terminal. TrackNotch's main strength: ensures privacy with local-first data processing and no telemetry.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools