LGTM vs Snyk: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for LGTM and Snyk side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
LGTM
Code analysis platform integrated into GitHub for identifying security vulnerabilities.
Best for you if:
- • You want a fully free tool (Snyk requires payment)
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Best for you if:
- • You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
| At a Glance | LGTM | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free 100% free | Free plan, paid from $25/mo, billed monthly Team plan |
Category | Testing & QA Security | Security Testing & QA |
Rating | n/a | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 157 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines |
Choose LGTM or Snyk?
Choose LGTM if
- You want a fully free tool (Snyk requires payment)
- You want integrated directly into GitHub for seamless workflow (now via GitHub code scanning)
- You want utilized powerful CodeQL analysis engine
- You work in testing & QA, not security
Choose Snyk if
- You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- You want broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
- You work in security, not testing & QA
In-Depth Analysis
LGTM
Code analysis platform integrated into GitHub for identifying security vulnerabilities.
Strengths
- Pro: Integrated directly into GitHub for seamless workflow (now via GitHub code scanning)
- Pro: Utilized powerful CodeQL analysis engine
- Pro: Automated detection of security issues
- Pro: Provided code quality insights
Weaknesses
- Con: No longer available as a standalone product
- Con: Requires migration to GitHub code scanning for continued use of its core functionality
- Con: Advanced build configurations might require manual migration effort
Key features
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Snyk Free is usable for individual developers but test limits are tight (200 SCA, 100 SAST, 100 container tests/month).
Watch out
Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines
Strengths
- Pro: Developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- Pro: Broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
- Pro: Automated fix pull requests save significant remediation time
- Pro: Generous free tier with 200 open-source and 100 code tests per month
- Pro: AI-powered prioritization focuses teams on the most exploitable vulnerabilities first
Weaknesses
- Con: Team plan limited to 10 developers per organization, requiring Ignite for larger teams
- Con: Ignite tier at $1,260/year per developer is expensive for mid-size teams
- Con: DAST scanning limited to 10 targets even on Ignite plan
- Con: Advanced features like custom rules and SSO only available on Ignite and above
- Con: Can produce noisy results on large monorepos without careful policy tuning
Key features
Plans and prices: LGTM vs Snyk
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| LGTM | No plan prices on file | lgtm.com/pricing |
| Snyk |
| snyk.io/plans read Oct 12, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on LGTM pricing and Snyk pricing.
Key Takeaways
LGTM
- Choose if you want code analysis platform integrated into GitHub for identifying security vulnerabilities
Snyk
- Choose if you want secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Only Snyk has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 157 reviews); LGTM has none we can show.
- Snyk starts at $25/mo, billed monthly; LGTM has no public paid plan price on file.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do LGTM and Snyk compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only Snyk has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 157 reviews); LGTM has none we can show. Snyk starts at $25/mo, billed monthly; LGTM has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.
What are LGTM and Snyk used for?
LGTM: Code analysis platform integrated into GitHub for identifying security vulnerabilities. Snyk: Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production.
What does LGTM cost vs Snyk?
LGTM is free. Snyk's cheapest paid plan is Team at $25/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 12, 2026.
What's the main difference between LGTM and Snyk?
LGTM's main strength: integrated directly into GitHub for seamless workflow (now via GitHub code scanning). Snyk's main strength: developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests.