Lighthouse vs Web Vitals: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Lighthouse and Web Vitals side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Lighthouse
Web performance auditing by Google
Best for you if:
- • You want google performance tool
Web Vitals
Core performance metrics by Google
Best for you if:
- • You want performance metrics
| At a Glance | ||
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan | Free plan |
Category | Testing & QA SEO Tools | SEO Tools Web Analytics |
Rating | n/a | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | No advanced features like historical data storage. |
Choose Lighthouse or Web Vitals?
Choose Lighthouse if
- You want google performance tool
- You want free and open source
- You work in testing & QA, not SEO tools
Choose Web Vitals if
- You want performance metrics
- You want google standard
- You work in SEO tools, not testing & QA
In-Depth Analysis
Lighthouse
Web performance auditing by Google
Lighthouse is exceptionally generous as it is completely free and built directly into Chrome DevTools.
Strengths
- Pro: Google performance tool
- Pro: Free and open source
- Pro: Comprehensive audits
- Pro: CI/CD integration
- Pro: Industry standard
Weaknesses
- Con: Results vary
- Con: Can be misleading
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Score gaming possible
- Con: Not real user data
Key features
Web Vitals
Core performance metrics by Google
The pricing for Web Vitals is exceptionally fair and generous, as it is offered completely free of charge.
Watch out
No advanced features like historical data storage.
Strengths
- Pro: Performance metrics
- Pro: Google standard
- Pro: Good library
- Pro: Active development
- Pro: Free
Weaknesses
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Implementation needed
- Con: Metrics can mislead
- Con: Tooling varies
- Con: Score gaming
Key features
Plans and prices: Lighthouse vs Web Vitals
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Lighthouse |
| developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse read Oct 4, 2026 |
| Web Vitals |
| web.dev/vitals read Oct 5, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Lighthouse pricing and Web Vitals pricing.
Key Takeaways
Lighthouse
- Choose if you want web performance auditing by Google
Web Vitals
- Choose if you want core performance metrics by Google
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Lighthouse and Web Vitals compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Both have a free plan.
What are Lighthouse and Web Vitals used for?
Lighthouse: Web performance auditing by Google. Web Vitals: Core performance metrics by Google.
What does Lighthouse cost vs Web Vitals?
Lighthouse has no public paid-plan price on file. Web Vitals has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 5, 2026.
What's the main difference between Lighthouse and Web Vitals?
Lighthouse's main strength: google performance tool. Web Vitals's main strength: performance metrics.