Milvus vs Turbopuffer: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Milvus and Turbopuffer side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Milvus leads on a free plan; Turbopuffer leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Milvus
Open-source vector database for AI
Best for you if:
- • You want a fully free tool (Turbopuffer requires payment)
Turbopuffer
Serverless vector and full-text search engine built on object storage for AI applications.
Best for you if:
- • You want significantly reduces operational costs compared to traditional vector databases
| At a Glance | Milvus | Turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $126/mo, billed monthly Zilliz Dedicated (Standard) plan | From $64/mo, billed monthly launch plan |
Category | Vector Databases Data & Databases | Data & Databases Vector Databases |
Rating | 4.8/5 Capterra 4.8 · G2 4.7 310 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | No |
Watch out for | Overage fees for vCUs on Serverless tier | n/a |
Choose Milvus or Turbopuffer?
Choose Milvus if
- You want a fully free tool (Turbopuffer requires payment)
- You want high performance
- You want scalable
Choose Turbopuffer if
- You want significantly reduces operational costs compared to traditional vector databases
- You want handles massive scale with 2.5T+ documents and 10M+ writes/s in production
- Budget matters ($64/mo, billed monthly vs $126/mo, billed monthly)
In-Depth Analysis
Milvus
Open-source vector database for AI
Milvus offers a very generous pricing model, especially with its robust open-source option and the Zilliz Cloud Free tier providing 5GB storage and 2.5M vCUs/month at no cost.
Watch out
Overage fees for vCUs on Serverless tier
Strengths
- Pro: High performance
- Pro: Scalable
- Pro: Open source
- Pro: Good for large scale
- Pro: Active development
Weaknesses
- Con: Complex operations
- Con: Heavy resource usage
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Kubernetes recommended
- Con: Documentation dense
Key features
Turbopuffer
Serverless vector and full-text search engine built on object storage for AI applications.
Turbopuffer's pricing, starting at $64/month for 'Launch' and jumping to $256/month for 'Scale', appears quite expensive compared to other serverless vector database solutions that often offer generous free tiers or usage-based pricing.
Strengths
- Pro: Significantly reduces operational costs compared to traditional vector databases.
- Pro: Handles massive scale with 2.5T+ documents and 10M+ writes/s in production.
- Pro: Provides extremely low latency search results, even for large datasets.
- Pro: Offers robust security and compliance features including SOC2, GDPR, and HIPAA readiness.
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires a minimum monthly commitment for all pricing tiers.
- Con: Specific details on data migration tools from other databases are not explicitly detailed.
- Con: The 'Launch' plan does not include HIPAA readiness or SSO.
Key features
Plans and prices: Milvus vs Turbopuffer
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Milvus |
| zilliz.com/pricing read Oct 26, 2026 |
| Turbopuffer |
| turbopuffer.com/pricing read Sep 28, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Milvus pricing and Turbopuffer pricing.
Key Takeaways
Milvus
- Has a free plan
Turbopuffer
- Lower entry price: $64/mo, billed monthly vs $126/mo, billed monthly
What the data shows
On the data below, Milvus leads on a free plan; Turbopuffer leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Milvus has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 310 reviews); Turbopuffer has none we can show.
- Turbopuffer has the lower entry price: $64/mo, billed monthly (launch) against $126/mo, billed monthly (Zilliz Dedicated (Standard)) for Milvus.
- Only Milvus has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Milvus and Turbopuffer compare in 2026?
On the data below, Milvus leads on a free plan; Turbopuffer leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Milvus has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 310 reviews); Turbopuffer has none we can show. Turbopuffer has the lower entry price: $64/mo, billed monthly (launch) against $126/mo, billed monthly (Zilliz Dedicated (Standard)) for Milvus. Only Milvus has a free plan.
What are Milvus and Turbopuffer used for?
Milvus: Open-source vector database for AI. Turbopuffer: Serverless vector and full-text search engine built on object storage for AI applications.
What does Milvus cost vs Turbopuffer?
Milvus's cheapest paid plan is Zilliz Dedicated (Standard) at $126/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Turbopuffer's cheapest paid plan is launch at $64/mo, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 26, 2026.
What's the main difference between Milvus and Turbopuffer?
Milvus's main strength: high performance. Turbopuffer's main strength: significantly reduces operational costs compared to traditional vector databases.
Spotted an outdated price or a wrong fact? Suggest a correction: we check it against the vendor's own page. Work for one of these vendors? Claim your listing to update it yourself.