Ninox vs WeWeb: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Ninox and WeWeb side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Ninox leads on lower entry price; WeWeb leads on higher user rating and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Ninox
Custom database and app builder
Best for you if:
- • You want rapid development of data-centric solutions using a low-code platform with an intuitive drag-and-drop interface
WeWeb
Build web-apps 10x faster with AI & no-code, from idea to production-ready code.
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Ninox | WeWeb |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $11/user/mo, billed monthly Starter plan | Free plan, paid from $16/mo, billed monthly Essential plan |
Category | No-Code App Builders | No-Code App Builders |
Rating | 4.5/5 G2 4.7 · Capterra 4.7 · SourceForge 2.5 559 reviews | 4.8/5 Capterra 4.8 · G2 4.9 59 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Two-layer pricing adds up fast: You need both a seat plan AND a hosting plan per published project. |
Choose Ninox or WeWeb?
Choose Ninox if
- You want rapid development of data-centric solutions using a low-code platform with an intuitive drag-and-drop interface
- You want highly customizable to unique business processes, allowing users to build complex data models with hierarchies and relationships
- Budget matters ($11/user/mo, billed monthly vs $16/mo, billed monthly)
Choose WeWeb if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want no-code frontend
- You want supabase integration
In-Depth Analysis
Ninox
Custom database and app builder
Ninox's pricing is fair, especially for small to medium-sized teams.
Strengths
- Pro: Rapid development of data-centric solutions using a low-code platform with an intuitive drag-and-drop interface.
- Pro: Highly customizable to unique business processes, allowing users to build complex data models with hierarchies and relationships.
- Pro: Offers extensive automation capabilities for workflows like approval processes and report generation.
- Pro: Provides robust integration options with third-party tools such as DATEV, Zapier, Integrately, and direct API access.
- Pro: Enterprise-grade security features including ISO 9001 and 27001 certifications, custom password policies, SSO (OIDC, ADDS, SAML), and granular user role management.
Weaknesses
- Con: On-Premises deployment does not offer the full range of features compared to the cloud-hosted versions.
- Con: Advanced PDF document creation limits vary significantly by plan, with the Starter plan offering only 100 per month.
Key features
WeWeb
Build web-apps 10x faster with AI & no-code, from idea to production-ready code.
WeWeb uses a two-layer pricing model: seat plans (editor access) plus hosting plans (deployment).
Watch out
Two-layer pricing adds up fast: You need both a seat plan AND a hosting plan per published project.
Strengths
- Pro: No-code frontend
- Pro: Supabase integration
- Pro: Good features
- Pro: Active development
- Pro: Fair pricing
Weaknesses
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Feature gaps
- Con: Better alternatives exist
- Con: Documentation improving
- Con: Still maturing
Key features
Plans and prices: Ninox vs WeWeb
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Ninox |
| ninox.com/pricing read Oct 1, 2026 |
| WeWeb |
| weweb.io/pricing read Oct 20, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Ninox pricing and WeWeb pricing.
Key Takeaways
Ninox
- Lower entry price: $11/user/mo, billed monthly vs $16/mo, billed monthly
WeWeb
- Higher user rating: 4.8/5 vs 4.5/5
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Ninox leads on lower entry price; WeWeb leads on higher user rating and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- WeWeb has the higher user rating (4.5/5 from 559 reviews for Ninox, 4.8/5 from 59 reviews for WeWeb).
- Ninox has the lower entry price: $11/user/mo, billed monthly (Starter) against $16/mo, billed monthly (Essential) for WeWeb.
- Only WeWeb has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Ninox and WeWeb compare in 2026?
On the data below, Ninox leads on lower entry price; WeWeb leads on higher user rating and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. WeWeb has the higher user rating (4.5/5 from 559 reviews for Ninox, 4.8/5 from 59 reviews for WeWeb). Ninox has the lower entry price: $11/user/mo, billed monthly (Starter) against $16/mo, billed monthly (Essential) for WeWeb. Only WeWeb has a free plan.
What are Ninox and WeWeb used for?
Ninox: Custom database and app builder. WeWeb: Build web-apps 10x faster with AI & no-code, from idea to production-ready code.
What does Ninox cost vs WeWeb?
Ninox's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $11/user/mo, billed monthly. WeWeb's cheapest paid plan is Essential at $16/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 20, 2026.
What's the main difference between Ninox and WeWeb?
Ninox's main strength: rapid development of data-centric solutions using a low-code platform with an intuitive drag-and-drop interface. WeWeb's main strength: no-code frontend.