Skip to content

Noma Security vs Prompt Security: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)

Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Noma Security and Prompt Security side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.

On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

Data comparison compiled by Toolradar, not hand-reviewed Methodology
Data comparison

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:

Noma Security

Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime

Best for you if:

  • • You want provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors

Prompt Security

Secure your generative AI, from shadow AI to LLM threats

Best for you if:

  • • You want provides a holistic approach to AI security, covering employees, homegrown apps, and code assistants
At a glance: Noma Security vs Prompt Security
At a Glance
Noma Security Noma Security
Prompt Security Prompt Security
Starts at
Not published
Not published
Category
Security AI Assistants
Security AI Assistants
Rating
n/a n/a
Free plan
No No

Choose Noma Security or Prompt Security?

Noma Security

Choose Noma Security if

  • You want provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors
  • You want offers deep visibility into the entire AI landscape, including dependencies and connections, which traditional tools miss
Prompt Security

Choose Prompt Security if

  • You want provides a holistic approach to AI security, covering employees, homegrown apps, and code assistants
  • You want offers robust protection against a wide range of AI-specific threats, including those identified by OWASP

In-Depth Analysis

Noma Security Noma Security

Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime

Strengths

  • Pro: Provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors.
  • Pro: Offers deep visibility into the entire AI landscape, including dependencies and connections, which traditional tools miss.
  • Pro: Enables real-time protection and policy enforcement at runtime, preventing threats and ensuring compliance.
  • Pro: Integrates seamlessly into existing security and development workflows, minimizing disruption.

Weaknesses

  • Con: Requires integration into complex AI development and deployment environments.
  • Con: The effectiveness of threat detection relies on continuous updates to keep pace with evolving AI attack techniques.

Key features

Continuous AI landscape discovery and dependency mapping Real-time AI threat protection (prompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage) AI supply chain risk identification and remediation Automated AI red teaming and continuous testing AI agent runtime protection and policy enforcement Contextual insights into AI models, agents, and data access

Prompt Security Prompt Security

Secure your generative AI, from shadow AI to LLM threats

Strengths

  • Pro: Provides a holistic approach to AI security, covering employees, homegrown apps, and code assistants.
  • Pro: Offers robust protection against a wide range of AI-specific threats, including those identified by OWASP.
  • Pro: Features flexible deployment and LLM-agnostic integration for broad compatibility.
  • Pro: Includes AI Red Teaming and a Prompt Fuzzer to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.

Weaknesses

  • Con: Requires integration into existing AI and tech stacks, which may involve initial setup effort.
  • Con: The comprehensive nature of the platform might be more than what smaller organizations with limited AI adoption require.

Key features

Shadow AI prevention Data privacy enforcement and anonymization Prompt injection protection Jailbreak prevention Denial of Wallet/Service protection Content moderation for LLM responses

Key Takeaways

Noma Security

  • Choose if you want secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime

Prompt Security

  • Choose if you want secure your generative AI, from shadow AI to LLM threats

What the data shows

On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

    Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How do Noma Security and Prompt Security compare in 2026?

    On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

    What are Noma Security and Prompt Security used for?

    Noma Security: Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime. Prompt Security: Secure your generative AI, from shadow AI to LLM threats.

    What does Noma Security cost vs Prompt Security?

    Noma Security has no public paid-plan price on file. Prompt Security has no public paid-plan price on file.

    What's the main difference between Noma Security and Prompt Security?

    Noma Security's main strength: provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors. Prompt Security's main strength: provides a holistic approach to AI security, covering employees, homegrown apps, and code assistants.

    Related Comparisons & Resources

    Compare other tools