Noma Security vs Willow: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Noma Security and Willow side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Willow leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Noma Security
Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime
Best for you if:
- • You want provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors
Willow
Govern AI agents with scoped access, runtime enforcement, and shadow AI detection
Best for you if:
- • Enterprise security, AI enablement and IT teams governing AI agent access to company tools and MCPs
| At a Glance | Noma Security | Willow |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Not published | Free plan |
Category | Security AI Assistants | Security Identity & Access |
Rating | n/a | n/a |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Choose Noma Security or Willow?
Choose Noma Security if
- You want provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors
- You want offers deep visibility into the entire AI landscape, including dependencies and connections, which traditional tools miss
Choose Willow if
- Enterprise security, AI enablement and IT teams governing AI agent access to company tools and MCPs
- You want a free tier before you commit
In-Depth Analysis
Noma Security
Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime
Strengths
- Pro: Provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors.
- Pro: Offers deep visibility into the entire AI landscape, including dependencies and connections, which traditional tools miss.
- Pro: Enables real-time protection and policy enforcement at runtime, preventing threats and ensuring compliance.
- Pro: Integrates seamlessly into existing security and development workflows, minimizing disruption.
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires integration into complex AI development and deployment environments.
- Con: The effectiveness of threat detection relies on continuous updates to keep pace with evolving AI attack techniques.
Key features
Willow
Govern AI agents with scoped access, runtime enforcement, and shadow AI detection
Key features
Key Takeaways
Noma Security
- Choose if you want secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime
Willow
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Willow leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Willow has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Noma Security and Willow compare in 2026?
On the data below, Willow leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Willow has a free plan.
What are Noma Security and Willow used for?
Noma Security: Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime. Willow: Govern AI agents with scoped access, runtime enforcement, and shadow AI detection.
What does Noma Security cost vs Willow?
Noma Security has no public paid-plan price on file. Willow has no public paid-plan price on file.
What's the main difference between Noma Security and Willow?
Noma Security's main strength: provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors. Willow focuses on govern AI agents with scoped access, runtime enforcement, and shadow AI detection.