Octoparse vs Trigger.dev: Which is Better in 2026?
Choosing between Octoparse and Trigger.dev comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.
Bottom line: Trigger.dev wins this matchup. Our overall Automation pick is Meety 2.0. Our free Automation pick is Jira MCP Server. Pick Octoparse if you need no-code.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:
Octoparse
No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
Best for you if:
- • You need no-code features specifically
- • No-code scraper. Free is local-only with 10 saved tasks and a 50K-row monthly export cap.
- • Standard from $83/mo or $69/mo billed annually. Professional $299 / $249. Page title: from $69/month (octoparse.com/pricing).
Trigger.dev
Background jobs for serverless
Best for you if:
- • You need developer tools features specifically
- • Trigger.dev is an open-source background jobs framework for TypeScript
- • It runs long-running tasks with retries and scheduling
| At a Glance | ||
|---|---|---|
Starts at | FreeFree tier available | FreeFree tier available |
Best For | No-Code | Developer Tools |
Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.4/5 |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Choose Octoparse or Trigger.dev?
Choose Octoparse if
No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
- A real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site.
- Printed Standard and Professional numbers plus a 5-day money-back window.
- Cloud concurrency is explicit: 3 runs on Standard, 20 on Professional.
- Your work is no-code-shaped, not developer tools-shaped
Choose Trigger.dev if
Background jobs for serverless
- Background jobs made easy
- TypeScript native
- Good DX
- Your work is developer tools-shaped, not no-code-shaped
| Feature | Octoparse | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| User Rating | ★4.7/5 159 reviews | ★4.4/5 16 reviews |
| Categories | No-CodeDeveloper Tools | Developer ToolsAutomation |
In-Depth Analysis
Octoparse
No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
The Free tier is generous for local scraping, and Standard at $69/mo is fair for cloud extraction with proxies and CAPTCHA solving.
Watch out
Free tier is local only, cloud extraction requires paid plan
Strengths
- +A real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site.
- +Printed Standard and Professional numbers plus a 5-day money-back window.
- +Cloud concurrency is explicit: 3 runs on Standard, 20 on Professional.
Weaknesses
- -Free cannot schedule in the cloud. Overnight jobs need Standard.
- -Not an API-first crawler. Engineering teams that want code usually pick Scrapy, Crawlee, or Browserless.
Key features
Trigger.dev
Background jobs for serverless
Trigger.dev's pricing model is quite generous, especially for early-stage projects and small teams.
Watch out
Overage fees for exceeding included usage credits
Strengths
- +Background jobs made easy
- +TypeScript native
- +Good DX
- +Open source
- +Active development
Weaknesses
- -Newer platform
- -Cloud expensive at scale
- -Learning curve
- -Documentation improving
- -Smaller community
Key features
Pricing: Octoparse vs Trigger.dev
| Plan | Octoparse | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Free Free | Free Free |
| Tier 2 | $69/mo Standard | $10 Hobby |
| Tier 3 | $249/mo Professional | $50 Pro |
| Tier 4 | Contact us Enterprise | Enterprise |
Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on Octoparse pricing and Trigger.dev pricing.
Who Should Use What?
On a budget?
Both are freemium. Compare plans on their websites.
Go with: Octoparse
Want the highest-rated option?
Octoparse: 4.7/5 (159 reviews). Trigger.dev: 4.4/5 (16 reviews).
Go with: Octoparse
Value user reviews?
Octoparse: 159 reviews (4.7/5). Trigger.dev: 16 reviews (4.4/5).
Go with: Octoparse
3 Questions to Help You Decide
What's your budget?
Both are freemium. Pricing won't help you decide here.
What's your use case?
Octoparse is a no-code tool. Trigger.dev is in developer tools. Pick the category that matches your needs.
How important are ratings?
Octoparse is rated higher: 4.7/5 vs 4.4/5.
Key Takeaways
Trigger.dev
- Free tier available
- Our pick for this comparison
Octoparse
- Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.4/5
- Larger review base (159 reviews)
- Better fit for no-code
The Bottom Line
Trigger.dev wins this matchup. Our overall Automation pick is Meety 2.0. Our free Automation pick is Jira MCP Server.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Octoparse or Trigger.dev better?
Trigger.dev is rated in our evaluation. Both are freemium.
What are Octoparse and Trigger.dev used for?
Octoparse: No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction. Trigger.dev: Background jobs for serverless.
What does Octoparse cost vs Trigger.dev?
Octoparse is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Trigger.dev is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.
