Octoparse vs Trigger.dev: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Octoparse and Trigger.dev side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Trigger.dev leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Octoparse
No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
Best for you if:
- • You want a real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site
Trigger.dev
Background jobs for serverless
Best for you if:
- • You want background jobs made easy
| At a Glance | Trigger.dev | |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $69/mo, billed monthly Standard plan | Free plan, paid from $10/mo Hobby plan |
Category | Automation Developer Tools | Developer Tools Serverless |
Rating | 4.8/5 G2 4.8 52 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Free tier is local only, cloud extraction requires paid plan | Overage fees for exceeding included usage credits |
Choose Octoparse or Trigger.dev?
Choose Octoparse if
- You want a real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site
- You want details on Standard and Professional tiers plus a 5-day money-back window
- You work in automation, not developer tools
Choose Trigger.dev if
- You want background jobs made easy
- You want TypeScript native
- Budget matters ($10/mo vs $69/mo, billed monthly)
- You work in developer tools, not automation
In-Depth Analysis
Octoparse
No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
The Free tier is generous for local scraping, and Standard at $69/mo is fair for cloud extraction with proxies and CAPTCHA solving.
Watch out
Free tier is local only, cloud extraction requires paid plan
Strengths
- Pro: A real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site.
- Pro: Details on Standard and Professional tiers plus a 5-day money-back window.
- Pro: Cloud concurrency is explicit: 3 runs on Standard, 20 on Professional.
Weaknesses
- Con: Free cannot schedule in the cloud. Overnight jobs need a paid plan.
- Con: Not an API-first crawler. Engineering teams that want code usually pick Scrapy, Crawlee, or Browserless.
Key features
Trigger.dev
Background jobs for serverless
Trigger.dev's pricing model is quite generous, especially for early-stage projects and small teams.
Watch out
Overage fees for exceeding included usage credits
Strengths
- Pro: Background jobs made easy
- Pro: TypeScript native
- Pro: Good DX
- Pro: Open source
- Pro: Active development
Weaknesses
- Con: Newer platform
- Con: Cloud expensive at scale
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Documentation improving
- Con: Smaller community
Key features
Plans and prices: Octoparse vs Trigger.dev
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Octoparse |
| octoparse.com/pricing read Oct 19, 2026 |
| Trigger.dev |
| trigger.dev/pricing read Oct 12, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Octoparse pricing and Trigger.dev pricing.
Key Takeaways
Octoparse
- Choose if you want no-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
Trigger.dev
- Lower entry price: $10/mo vs $69/mo, billed monthly
What the data shows
On the data below, Trigger.dev leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Octoparse has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 52 reviews); Trigger.dev has none we can show.
- Trigger.dev has the lower entry price: $10/mo (Hobby) against $69/mo, billed monthly (Standard) for Octoparse.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Octoparse and Trigger.dev compare in 2026?
On the data below, Trigger.dev leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Octoparse has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 52 reviews); Trigger.dev has none we can show. Trigger.dev has the lower entry price: $10/mo (Hobby) against $69/mo, billed monthly (Standard) for Octoparse. Both have a free plan.
What are Octoparse and Trigger.dev used for?
Octoparse: No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction. Trigger.dev: Background jobs for serverless.
What does Octoparse cost vs Trigger.dev?
Octoparse's cheapest paid plan is Standard at $69/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Trigger.dev's cheapest paid plan is Hobby at $10/mo; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 19, 2026.
What's the main difference between Octoparse and Trigger.dev?
Octoparse's main strength: a real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site. Trigger.dev's main strength: background jobs made easy.