OnlineOrNot vs Uptime Kuma: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for OnlineOrNot and Uptime Kuma side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
OnlineOrNot
Uptime monitoring and status pages for websites, APIs, and scheduled tasks.
Best for you if:
- • You want detects downtime quickly with checks as frequent as every 30 seconds
Uptime Kuma
Self-hosted uptime monitoring with beautiful status pages
Best for you if:
- • You want a fully free tool (OnlineOrNot requires payment)
| At a Glance | OnlineOrNot | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $12/mo, billed monthly Pro plan | Free 100% free |
Category | Monitoring Status Pages | Monitoring Status Pages |
Rating | 4.9/5 G2 4.9 · Capterra 5.0 6 reviews | 4.6/5 G2 4.6 348 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Choose OnlineOrNot or Uptime Kuma?
Choose OnlineOrNot if
- You want detects downtime quickly with checks as frequent as every 30 seconds
- You want minimizes support load by keeping customers informed via status pages
Choose Uptime Kuma if
- You want a fully free tool (OnlineOrNot requires payment)
- You want self-hosted uptime monitoring
- You want clean UI
In-Depth Analysis
OnlineOrNot
Uptime monitoring and status pages for websites, APIs, and scheduled tasks.
OnlineOrNot offers a very generous Free tier, making it accessible for small projects and personal use.
Strengths
- Pro: Detects downtime quickly with checks as frequent as every 30 seconds
- Pro: Minimizes support load by keeping customers informed via status pages
- Pro: Highly configurable monitoring options for various use cases
- Pro: Integrates with a wide range of popular incident management and communication tools
- Pro: Customer-backed and responsive to user feedback for continuous improvement
Weaknesses
- Con: Advanced features like browser checks and additional status pages are add-ons or part of higher tiers
- Con: Custom domains for status pages are not available on the free tier
- Con: Data retention for historical uptime is limited on lower tiers
Key features
Uptime Kuma
Self-hosted uptime monitoring with beautiful status pages
Uptime Kuma's pricing is exceptionally generous, being entirely free.
Strengths
- Pro: Self-hosted uptime monitoring
- Pro: Clean UI
- Pro: Many check types
- Pro: Free and open source
- Pro: Easy Docker setup
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires self-hosting
- Con: Single instance only
- Con: Limited scalability
- Con: No team features
- Con: Basic compared to paid
Key features
Plans and prices: OnlineOrNot vs Uptime Kuma
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OnlineOrNot |
| onlineornot.com/pricing read Oct 24, 2026 |
| Uptime Kuma |
| github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma read Sep 30, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on OnlineOrNot pricing and Uptime Kuma pricing.
Key Takeaways
OnlineOrNot
- Choose if you want uptime monitoring and status pages for websites, APIs, and scheduled tasks
Uptime Kuma
- Choose if you want self-hosted uptime monitoring with beautiful status pages
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.9/5 from 6 reviews for OnlineOrNot, 4.6/5 from 348 reviews for Uptime Kuma; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides).
- OnlineOrNot starts at $12/mo, billed monthly; Uptime Kuma has no public paid plan price on file.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do OnlineOrNot and Uptime Kuma compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.9/5 from 6 reviews for OnlineOrNot, 4.6/5 from 348 reviews for Uptime Kuma; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides). OnlineOrNot starts at $12/mo, billed monthly; Uptime Kuma has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.
What are OnlineOrNot and Uptime Kuma used for?
OnlineOrNot: Uptime monitoring and status pages for websites, APIs, and scheduled tasks. Uptime Kuma: Self-hosted uptime monitoring with beautiful status pages.
What does OnlineOrNot cost vs Uptime Kuma?
OnlineOrNot's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $12/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Uptime Kuma is free. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 24, 2026.
What's the main difference between OnlineOrNot and Uptime Kuma?
OnlineOrNot's main strength: detects downtime quickly with checks as frequent as every 30 seconds. Uptime Kuma's main strength: self-hosted uptime monitoring.