Optimus vs Shortpixel: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Optimus and Shortpixel side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Optimus
Smart image compression for WordPress to accelerate websites and improve PageSpeed.
Best for you if:
- • You want a tool that optimizes all image sizes, including thumbnails, unlike many other tools
Shortpixel
Compress and optimize images to boost website speed and improve SEO.
Best for you if:
- • You want a tool that significantly improves website loading speed and SEO
| At a Glance | Optimus | Shortpixel |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $3.25/mo, billed yearly Optimus HQ plan | Free 100% free |
Category | SEO Tools Image Editing | Image Editing Developer Tools |
Rating | 4.6/5 G2 4.6 10 reviews | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 69 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Choose Optimus or Shortpixel?
Choose Optimus if
- You want a tool that optimizes all image sizes, including thumbnails, unlike many other tools
Choose Shortpixel if
- You want a tool that significantly improves website loading speed and SEO
- You want a tool that automates image optimization, saving time and effort
In-Depth Analysis
Optimus
Smart image compression for WordPress to accelerate websites and improve PageSpeed.
Optimus offers a fair pricing structure, especially with its generous free tier and the affordable Optimus HQ at $39/year.
Strengths
- Pro: Significant file size reduction (up to 70%) while maintaining visual quality
- Pro: Optimizes all image sizes, including thumbnails, unlike many other tools
- Pro: Improves website loading times and PageSpeed scores, benefiting SEO
- Pro: Generates WebP and progressive JPEGs for modern web performance
- Pro: Transparent pricing with no hidden costs or automatic renewals
Weaknesses
- Con: Free version has a strict 100 KB file size limit per image
- Con: Requires images to be transferred to Optimus servers for processing
- Con: Free version does not include WebP conversion or HTTPS connection
Key features
Shortpixel
Compress and optimize images to boost website speed and improve SEO.
The extensive feature set suggests it's designed for high-volume users or agencies.
Strengths
- Pro: Significantly improves website loading speed and SEO.
- Pro: Automates image optimization, saving time and effort.
- Pro: Supports modern image formats for enhanced performance.
- Pro: Offers various compression levels to suit different quality needs.
- Pro: Provides extensive tools for both non-developers and developers.
Weaknesses
- Con: Some advanced features require development skills for integration.
- Con: Free plan has credit limitations.
Key features
Plans and prices: Optimus vs Shortpixel
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Optimus |
| optimus.io/pricing read Nov 10, 2026 |
| Shortpixel |
| shortpixel.com/pricing read Nov 9, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Optimus pricing and Shortpixel pricing.
Key Takeaways
Optimus
- Worth considering for SEO tools
Shortpixel
- Worth considering for image editing
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.6/5 from 10 reviews for Optimus, 4.5/5 from 69 reviews for Shortpixel; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides).
- Optimus starts at $3.25/mo, billed yearly; Shortpixel has no public paid plan price on file.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Optimus and Shortpixel compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.6/5 from 10 reviews for Optimus, 4.5/5 from 69 reviews for Shortpixel; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides). Optimus starts at $3.25/mo, billed yearly; Shortpixel has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.
What are Optimus and Shortpixel used for?
Optimus: Smart image compression for WordPress to accelerate websites and improve PageSpeed. Shortpixel: Compress and optimize images to boost website speed and improve SEO.
What does Optimus cost vs Shortpixel?
Optimus's cheapest paid plan is Optimus HQ at $3.25/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Shortpixel is free. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 10, 2026.
What's the main difference between Optimus and Shortpixel?
Optimus's main strength: significant file size reduction (up to 70%) while maintaining visual quality. Shortpixel's main strength: significantly improves website loading speed and SEO.
Spotted an outdated price or a wrong fact? Suggest a correction: we check it against the vendor's own page. Work for one of these vendors? Claim your listing to update it yourself.