Oxlint vs SWC: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Oxlint and SWC side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Oxlint
Fast JavaScript/TypeScript linter
Best for you if:
- • You want fast JS/TS linter
SWC
Super-fast TypeScript/JavaScript compiler
Best for you if:
- • You want very fast compilation
| At a Glance | Oxlint | SWC |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free 100% free | Free 100% free |
Category | Testing & QA Developer Tools | Developer Tools CI/CD |
Rating | n/a | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | No seat minimums or overage fees. | n/a |
Choose Oxlint or SWC?
Choose Oxlint if
- You want fast JS/TS linter
- You want rust-based
- You work in testing & QA, not developer tools
Choose SWC if
- You want very fast compilation
- You want rust-based
- You work in developer tools, not testing & QA
In-Depth Analysis
Oxlint
Fast JavaScript/TypeScript linter
Oxlint's pricing is exceptionally generous, offering a fully-featured, high-performance linter completely free under an MIT License.
Watch out
No seat minimums or overage fees.
Strengths
- Pro: Fast JS/TS linter
- Pro: Rust-based
- Pro: Good performance
- Pro: ESLint compatible
- Pro: Active development
Weaknesses
- Con: Newer tool
- Con: Not all ESLint rules
- Con: Ecosystem smaller
- Con: Still maturing
- Con: Migration effort
Key features
SWC
Super-fast TypeScript/JavaScript compiler
SWC's pricing is exceptionally generous, being entirely free.
Strengths
- Pro: Very fast compilation
- Pro: Rust-based
- Pro: Babel compatible
- Pro: Next.js default
- Pro: Active development
Weaknesses
- Con: Plugin ecosystem smaller
- Con: Some Babel features missing
- Con: Debugging harder
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Config different
Key features
Plans and prices: Oxlint vs SWC
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Oxlint |
| oxc-project.github.io read Oct 5, 2026 |
| SWC |
| swc.rs read Sep 29, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Oxlint pricing and SWC pricing.
Key Takeaways
Oxlint
- Choose if you want fast JavaScript/TypeScript linter
SWC
- Choose if you want super-fast TypeScript/JavaScript compiler
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Oxlint and SWC compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Both have a free plan.
What are Oxlint and SWC used for?
Oxlint: Fast JavaScript/TypeScript linter. SWC: Super-fast TypeScript/JavaScript compiler.
What does Oxlint cost vs SWC?
Oxlint is free. SWC is free. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 5, 2026.
What's the main difference between Oxlint and SWC?
Oxlint's main strength: fast JS/TS linter. SWC's main strength: very fast compilation.