Skip to content

Paw vs Requestly: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)

Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Paw and Requestly side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.

On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

Data comparison compiled by Toolradar, not hand-reviewed Methodology
Data comparison 14 user reviews compared Pricing checked Oct 6, 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:

Paw

Native Mac API client for beautiful, powerful API testing

Best for you if:

  • • You want mac API client

Requestly

Build, test, and debug APIs faster with a lightweight, open-source API client and web debugger.

Best for you if:

  • • You want a free tier before you commit
At a glance: Paw vs Requestly
At a Glance
Paw Paw
Requestly Requestly
Starts at
Free plan, paid from $10/user/mo, billed monthly Team plan
Free plan
Category
API Tools Developer Tools
API Tools Developer Tools
Rating
4.5/5 G2 4.5 9 reviews 4.7/5 G2 4.7 5 reviews
Free plan
No Yes

Choose Paw or Requestly?

Paw

Choose Paw if

  • You want mac API client
  • You want beautiful interface
Requestly

Choose Requestly if

  • You want a free tier before you commit
  • You want free and open-source, offering a cost-effective solution
  • You want lightweight and fast, designed for quick operations

In-Depth Analysis

Paw Paw

Native Mac API client for beautiful, powerful API testing

Good value

Paw's pricing is quite generous, especially with its robust free tier offering a full API client.

Strengths

  • Pro: Mac API client
  • Pro: Beautiful interface
  • Pro: Good features
  • Pro: Code generation
  • Pro: One-time purchase

Weaknesses

  • Con: Mac only
  • Con: Now RapidAPI Paw
  • Con: Postman alternative
  • Con: Subscription model now
  • Con: Declining development

Key features

API client Mac native Dynamic values Code generation Extensions Advanced

Requestly Requestly

Build, test, and debug APIs faster with a lightweight, open-source API client and web debugger.

Strengths

  • Pro: Free and open-source, offering a cost-effective solution.
  • Pro: Lightweight and fast, designed for quick operations.
  • Pro: Comprehensive features for both API testing and web debugging.
  • Pro: Strong emphasis on security and compliance for enterprise use.
  • Pro: Supports collaboration with team workspaces and Git sync.

Weaknesses

  • Con: Requires a desktop and desktop browser for full functionality.
  • Con: Desktop app currently only explicitly mentioned for Mac, implying limited cross-platform desktop support.
  • Con: May require some learning curve for users accustomed to other API tools.

Key features

API Client (Rest API Playground) HTTP Interceptor and Web Debugger Modify API Responses and Mock Servers Inject Custom JavaScript and CSS Pre & Post Request/Response Scripts GraphQL Support with Schema Introspection

Plans and prices: Paw vs Requestly

Plans and prices of Paw and Requestly, as read on each vendor's pricing page. Each plan keeps its own billing unit.
Tool Plans and prices Source
Paw
  • Free: Free
  • Team: $10/user/mo, billed monthly
paw.cloud/pricing read Oct 6, 2026
Requestly No plan prices on file requestly.io/pricing

Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Paw pricing and Requestly pricing.

Key Takeaways

Paw

  • Choose if you want native Mac API client for beautiful, powerful API testing

Requestly

  • Choose if you want build, test, and debug APIs faster with a lightweight, open-source API client and web debugger

What the data shows

On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

  • User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.5/5 from 9 reviews for Paw, 4.7/5 from 5 reviews for Requestly; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides).
  • Paw starts at $10/user/mo, billed monthly; Requestly has no public paid plan price on file.
  • Both have a free plan.

Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate

Frequently Asked Questions

How do Paw and Requestly compare in 2026?

On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.5/5 from 9 reviews for Paw, 4.7/5 from 5 reviews for Requestly; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides). Paw starts at $10/user/mo, billed monthly; Requestly has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.

What are Paw and Requestly used for?

Paw: Native Mac API client for beautiful, powerful API testing. Requestly: Build, test, and debug APIs faster with a lightweight, open-source API client and web debugger.

What does Paw cost vs Requestly?

Paw's cheapest paid plan is Team at $10/user/mo, billed monthly. Requestly has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 6, 2026.

What's the main difference between Paw and Requestly?

Paw's main strength: mac API client. Requestly's main strength: free and open-source, offering a cost-effective solution.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools