Skip to content

PostGraphile vs Stream: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)

Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for PostGraphile and Stream side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.

On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

Data comparison compiled by Toolradar, not hand-reviewed Methodology
Data comparison 53 user reviews compared Pricing checked Nov 2, 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:

PostGraphile

Instantly create powerful, extensible, and performant GraphQL APIs from your PostgreSQL database.

Best for you if:

  • • You want significantly reduces hand-written SQL and backend development time

Stream

Add chat and activity feeds to your app

Best for you if:

  • • You want chat and activity feeds
At a glance: PostGraphile vs Stream
At a Glance
PostGraphile PostGraphile
Stream Stream
Starts at
Free plan
Free plan
Category
API Tools Data & Databases
Communication API Tools
Rating
n/a 4.5/5 G2 4.5 53 reviews
Free plan
Yes Yes
Watch out for
n/a Custom pricing for 'Scale' and 'Enterprise' can lead to high costs.

Choose PostGraphile or Stream?

PostGraphile

Choose PostGraphile if

  • You want significantly reduces hand-written SQL and backend development time
  • You want adds type-safety and ensures Postgres schema compatibility
  • You work in API tools, not communication
Stream

Choose Stream if

  • You want chat and activity feeds
  • You want good APIs
  • You work in communication, not API tools

In-Depth Analysis

PostGraphile PostGraphile

Instantly create powerful, extensible, and performant GraphQL APIs from your PostgreSQL database.

Strengths

  • Pro: Significantly reduces hand-written SQL and backend development time.
  • Pro: Adds type-safety and ensures Postgres schema compatibility.
  • Pro: Provides a consistent developer experience across frontend and backend.
  • Pro: Offers excellent performance, handling high request volumes.
  • Pro: Highly extensible and configurable through a plugin system.

Weaknesses

  • Con: Advanced features for scalability and security require a commercial Pro plugin.
  • Con: Relies heavily on PostgreSQL, limiting database flexibility.
  • Con: Sponsorship model for Pro features might not suit all business structures.

Key features

Instant GraphQL API generation Automatic CRUD mutations Authentication via JWT or custom pgSettings Authorization with Row-Level Security (RLS) and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) Relay-compatible connections Filtering and ordering capabilities

Stream Stream

Add chat and activity feeds to your app

Good value

Stream's pricing model is generous for early-stage projects with its free 'Maker' tier offering 5M messages and 100 concurrent users.

Watch out

Custom pricing for 'Scale' and 'Enterprise' can lead to high costs.

Strengths

  • Pro: Chat and activity feeds
  • Pro: Good APIs
  • Pro: Active development
  • Pro: Good documentation
  • Pro: Scalable

Weaknesses

  • Con: Expensive at scale
  • Con: MAU-based pricing
  • Con: Learning curve
  • Con: Vendor lock-in
  • Con: Feature complexity

Key features

Activity feeds Chat Video AI moderation Scalable Multi-platform SDKs

Plans and prices: PostGraphile vs Stream

Plans and prices of PostGraphile and Stream, as read on each vendor's pricing page. Each plan keeps its own billing unit.
Tool Plans and prices Source
PostGraphile No plan prices on file graphile.org
Stream
  • Maker: Free
  • Scale: Custom pricing
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing
getstream.io/pricing read Nov 2, 2026

Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on PostGraphile pricing and Stream pricing.

Key Takeaways

PostGraphile

  • Choose if you want instantly create powerful, extensible, and performant GraphQL APIs from your PostgreSQL database

Stream

  • Choose if you want add chat and activity feeds to your app

What the data shows

On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.

  • Only Stream has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 53 reviews); PostGraphile has none we can show.
  • Both have a free plan.

Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate

Frequently Asked Questions

How do PostGraphile and Stream compare in 2026?

On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only Stream has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 53 reviews); PostGraphile has none we can show. Both have a free plan.

What are PostGraphile and Stream used for?

PostGraphile: Instantly create powerful, extensible, and performant GraphQL APIs from your PostgreSQL database. Stream: Add chat and activity feeds to your app.

What does PostGraphile cost vs Stream?

PostGraphile has no public paid-plan price on file. Stream has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 2, 2026.

What's the main difference between PostGraphile and Stream?

PostGraphile's main strength: significantly reduces hand-written SQL and backend development time. Stream's main strength: chat and activity feeds.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools