qsa.sh vs Snyk: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for qsa.sh and Snyk side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
qsa.sh
External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Best for you if:
- • You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
| At a Glance | qsa.sh | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $5/mo, billed monthly Full Pro plan | Free plan, paid from $25/mo flat, billed monthly Team plan |
Category | Security Vulnerability Scanning | Security Testing & QA |
Rating | n/a | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 157 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | No |
Watch out for | n/a | Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines |
Choose qsa.sh or Snyk?
Choose qsa.sh if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want zero installation, just run curl; no agent or software to deploy
- You want transparent and auditable, uses only public open-source tools, no black box
Choose Snyk if
- You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- You want broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
In-Depth Analysis
qsa.sh
External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal
The pricing is generous for casual use with a free tier that covers the top 1,000 ports, but the $5/mo Full Pro tier is a steal for continuous scanning of all ports, while $7/scan for Deep is steep for occasional use.
Strengths
- Pro: Zero installation, just run curl; no agent or software to deploy.
- Pro: Transparent and auditable, uses only public open-source tools, no black box.
- Pro: Strictly limited to scanning your own IP, with consent gate and opt-out for operators.
Weaknesses
- Con: IPv4 only, IPv6 connections are refused.
- Con: Free scan limited to one per 24 hours and only top 1,000 ports; Full and Deep require payment.
Key features
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Snyk Free is usable for individual developers but test limits are tight (200 SCA, 100 SAST, 100 container tests/month).
Watch out
Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines
Strengths
- Pro: Developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- Pro: Broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
- Pro: Automated fix pull requests save significant remediation time
- Pro: Generous free tier with 200 open-source and 100 code tests per month
- Pro: AI-powered prioritization focuses teams on the most exploitable vulnerabilities first
Weaknesses
- Con: Team plan limited to 10 developers per organization, requiring Ignite for larger teams
- Con: Ignite tier at $1,260/year per developer is expensive for mid-size teams
- Con: DAST scanning limited to 10 targets even on Ignite plan
- Con: Advanced features like custom rules and SSO only available on Ignite and above
- Con: Can produce noisy results on large monorepos without careful policy tuning
Key features
Plans and prices: qsa.sh vs Snyk
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| qsa.sh |
| qsa.sh/pricing read Oct 20, 2026 |
| Snyk |
| snyk.io/plans read Nov 2, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on qsa.sh pricing and Snyk pricing.
Key Takeaways
qsa.sh
- Choose if you want external port and vulnerability scans from your terminal
Snyk
- Choose if you want secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Only Snyk has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 157 reviews); qsa.sh has none we can show.
- Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: qsa.sh $5/mo, billed monthly; Snyk $25/mo flat, billed monthly.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do qsa.sh and Snyk compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only Snyk has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 157 reviews); qsa.sh has none we can show. Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: qsa.sh $5/mo, billed monthly; Snyk $25/mo flat, billed monthly. Both have a free plan.
What are qsa.sh and Snyk used for?
qsa.sh: External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal. Snyk: Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production.
What does qsa.sh cost vs Snyk?
qsa.sh's cheapest paid plan is Full Pro at $5/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Snyk's cheapest paid plan is Team at $25/mo flat, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between qsa.sh and Snyk?
qsa.sh's main strength: zero installation, just run curl; no agent or software to deploy. Snyk's main strength: developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests.