Riverside.fm vs SquadCast FM: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Riverside.fm and SquadCast FM side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, SquadCast FM leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Riverside.fm
Record podcasts and videos remotely
Best for you if:
- • You want local recording ensures studio quality regardless of internet connection
SquadCast FM
Record podcasts and video with auto-saved local tracks and cloud backups
Best for you if:
- • You want a free plan exists, with 1 show, 10 participants and 1 integration
| At a Glance | ||
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $29/mo Pro plan | Free plan, paid from $24/mo, billed yearly Hobbyist plan |
Category | Video & Media Transcription | Video & Media Podcasting Tools |
Rating | 4.4/5 G2 4.8 · Trustpilot 4.0 2,159 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Watermark on Free tier recordings | n/a |
Choose Riverside.fm or SquadCast FM?
Choose Riverside.fm if
- You want local recording ensures studio quality regardless of internet connection
- You want text-based editing makes video editing accessible to non-editors
Choose SquadCast FM if
- You want a free plan exists, with 1 show, 10 participants and 1 integration
- You want hobbyist offers a paid tier and adds 10 recording hours per editor
- Budget matters ($24/mo, billed yearly vs $29/mo)
In-Depth Analysis
Riverside.fm
Record podcasts and videos remotely
Riverside.fm offers a fair pricing structure, especially with the annual discounts.
Watch out
Watermark on Free tier recordings
Strengths
- Pro: Local recording ensures studio quality regardless of internet connection
- Pro: Text-based editing makes video editing accessible to non-editors
- Pro: Comprehensive all-in-one workflow from recording to distribution
- Pro: AI tools automate hours of manual post-production work
- Pro: Browser-based with no software installation required for guests
Weaknesses
- Con: Free plan limited in recording hours and includes a watermark
- Con: Advanced features like webinar support require higher-tier plans
- Con: AI dubbing and translation quality varies by language pair
- Con: High-resolution recording requires a paid plan
- Con: Business plan pricing is not transparent and requires contacting sales
Key features
SquadCast FM
Record podcasts and video with auto-saved local tracks and cloud backups
The pricing is fair for occasional podcasters, with the free tier offering a usable 1 hour per month and Hobbyist a reasonable $16/month annual for 10 hours.
Strengths
- Pro: A free plan exists, with 1 show, 10 participants and 1 integration
- Pro: Hobbyist offers a paid tier and adds 10 recording hours per editor
- Pro: Recordings are saved progressively, so a connection failure does not lose the whole session
- Pro: Annual billing offers a discount
Weaknesses
- Con: The free plan covers 1 recording hour per editor a month
- Con: Free exports are capped at 720p with watermarks
- Con: Paid plans are priced per person per month, so a team multiplies the price
- Con: Monthly billing costs more than annual billing
Key features
Plans and prices: Riverside.fm vs SquadCast FM
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Riverside.fm |
| riverside.com/pricing read Oct 26, 2026 |
| SquadCast FM |
| squadcast.fm/pricing read Oct 21, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Riverside.fm pricing and SquadCast FM pricing.
Key Takeaways
Riverside.fm
- Choose if you want record podcasts and videos remotely
SquadCast FM
- Lower entry price: $24/mo, billed yearly vs $29/mo
What the data shows
On the data below, SquadCast FM leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Riverside.fm has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 2,159 reviews); SquadCast FM has none we can show.
- SquadCast FM has the lower entry price: $24/mo, billed yearly (Hobbyist) against $29/mo (Pro) for Riverside.fm.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Riverside.fm and SquadCast FM compare in 2026?
On the data below, SquadCast FM leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Riverside.fm has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 2,159 reviews); SquadCast FM has none we can show. SquadCast FM has the lower entry price: $24/mo, billed yearly (Hobbyist) against $29/mo (Pro) for Riverside.fm. Both have a free plan.
What are Riverside.fm and SquadCast FM used for?
Riverside.fm: Record podcasts and videos remotely. SquadCast FM: Record podcasts and video with auto-saved local tracks and cloud backups.
What does Riverside.fm cost vs SquadCast FM?
Riverside.fm's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $29/mo; it also has a free plan. SquadCast FM's cheapest paid plan is Hobbyist at $24/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 26, 2026.
What's the main difference between Riverside.fm and SquadCast FM?
Riverside.fm's main strength: local recording ensures studio quality regardless of internet connection. SquadCast FM's main strength: a free plan exists, with 1 show, 10 participants and 1 integration.