Sourcegraph Cody vs Supermaven: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Sourcegraph Cody and Supermaven side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Sourcegraph Cody leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with codebase context
Best for you if:
- • You want codebase context
Supermaven
Write code 2x faster with AI-powered code completion and a powerful chat interface.
Best for you if:
- • You want significantly faster code completion compared to competitors
| At a Glance | ||
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $9/user/mo, billed monthly Pro plan | Free plan, paid from $10/mo, billed monthly Pro plan |
Category | AI Coding Developer Tools | AI Coding Developer Tools |
Rating | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 68 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Integration costs for specific tools not included. | Chat credits are limited to $5/month |
Choose Sourcegraph Cody or Supermaven?
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You want codebase context
- You want good for large repos
- Budget matters ($9/user/mo, billed monthly vs $10/mo, billed monthly)
Choose Supermaven if
- You want significantly faster code completion compared to competitors
- You want large 1 million token context window provides highly accurate and contextual suggestions
In-Depth Analysis
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with codebase context
Sourcegraph Cody's pricing is quite fair and generous, especially the Pro tier at $9 per user/month for unlimited usage and LLM choice.
Watch out
Integration costs for specific tools not included.
Strengths
- Pro: Codebase context
- Pro: Good for large repos
- Pro: Sourcegraph integration
- Pro: Multi-model support
- Pro: Enterprise features
Weaknesses
- Con: Sourcegraph dependency helpful
- Con: Setup for context
- Con: Less polished than Copilot
- Con: Enterprise pricing
- Con: Newer product
Key features
Supermaven
Write code 2x faster with AI-powered code completion and a powerful chat interface.
Supermaven's pricing is very fair and competitive, especially the Pro tier at $10/month which offers substantial AI capabilities.
Watch out
Chat credits are limited to $5/month
Strengths
- Pro: Significantly faster code completion compared to competitors
- Pro: Large 1 million token context window provides highly accurate and contextual suggestions
- Pro: Integrated AI chat streamlines developer workflows for problem-solving and code modification
- Pro: Supports popular IDEs, ensuring broad accessibility
- Pro: Free tier available for basic functionality
Weaknesses
- Con: Advanced features like the 1 million token context window and largest AI model are only available in paid plans
- Con: Data retention limit of 7 days on all plans (details not fully specified but mentioned)
Key features
Plans and prices: Sourcegraph Cody vs Supermaven
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Sourcegraph Cody |
| sourcegraph.com/cody/pricing read Oct 1, 2026 |
| Supermaven |
| supermaven.com/pricing read Oct 30, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Sourcegraph Cody pricing and Supermaven pricing.
Key Takeaways
Sourcegraph Cody
- Lower entry price: $9/user/mo, billed monthly vs $10/mo, billed monthly
Supermaven
- Choose if you want write code 2x faster with AI-powered code completion and a powerful chat interface
What the data shows
On the data below, Sourcegraph Cody leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Sourcegraph Cody has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 68 reviews); Supermaven has none we can show.
- Sourcegraph Cody has the lower entry price: $9/user/mo, billed monthly (Pro) against $10/mo, billed monthly (Pro) for Supermaven.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Sourcegraph Cody and Supermaven compare in 2026?
On the data below, Sourcegraph Cody leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Sourcegraph Cody has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 68 reviews); Supermaven has none we can show. Sourcegraph Cody has the lower entry price: $9/user/mo, billed monthly (Pro) against $10/mo, billed monthly (Pro) for Supermaven. Both have a free plan.
What are Sourcegraph Cody and Supermaven used for?
Sourcegraph Cody: AI coding assistant with codebase context. Supermaven: Write code 2x faster with AI-powered code completion and a powerful chat interface.
What does Sourcegraph Cody cost vs Supermaven?
Sourcegraph Cody's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $9/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Supermaven's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $10/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 30, 2026.
What's the main difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Supermaven?
Sourcegraph Cody's main strength: codebase context. Supermaven's main strength: significantly faster code completion compared to competitors.