Apollo.io vs Rodz: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Apollo.io and Rodz side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Apollo.io
Find leads, enrich contacts, automate outreach, and track engagement
Best for you if:
- • You want massive B2B contact database with 275M+ contacts
Rodz
Turn 46 real-time buying signals into enriched, deduplicated B2B leads
Best for you if:
- • Data resellers, outbound agencies and B2B sales teams that want to contact prospects within 48 hours of a buying trigger
| At a Glance | Apollo.io | Rodz |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $49/seat/mo, billed yearly Basic plan | Free plan |
Category | Lead Generation Sales Intelligence | Sales Intelligence Lead Generation |
Rating | 4.1/5 G2 4.7 · Trustpilot 2.9 · Capterra 4.5 11,273 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Minimum credit pack purchase of 500 credits |
Choose Apollo.io or Rodz?
Choose Apollo.io if
- You want massive B2B contact database with 275M+ contacts
- You want generous free tier with 50 credits/month
- You work in lead generation, not sales intelligence
Choose Rodz if
- Data resellers, outbound agencies and B2B sales teams that want to contact prospects within 48 hours of a buying trigger
- You want 46 signal types in one tool, from fundraisings and M&A to job changes and LinkedIn engagement
- You want native push to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Attio, lemlist, Instantly and Smartlead, plus webhooks, REST API and MCP
- You work in sales intelligence, not lead generation
In-Depth Analysis
Apollo.io
Find leads, enrich contacts, automate outreach, and track engagement
Apollo.io's pricing is fair for a sales intelligence and outreach platform.
Strengths
- Pro: Massive B2B contact database with 275M+ contacts
- Pro: Generous free tier with 50 credits/month
- Pro: All-in-one prospecting and engagement platform
- Pro: Strong CRM integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot
- Pro: AI-powered lead scoring and recommendations
Weaknesses
- Con: Data accuracy varies by region and industry
- Con: Credit system can be confusing
- Con: Email deliverability requires careful setup
- Con: Higher tiers needed for advanced features
- Con: Learning curve for full platform utilization
Key features
Rodz
Turn 46 real-time buying signals into enriched, deduplicated B2B leads
Rodz's pricing is fair and flexible, offering a free 100-credit allowance and credit packs from €50, with volume discounts down to €0.05 per credit for large buyers.
Watch out
Minimum credit pack purchase of 500 credits
Strengths
- Pro: 46 signal types in one tool, from fundraisings and M&A to job changes and LinkedIn engagement
- Pro: Native push to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Attio, lemlist, Instantly and Smartlead, plus webhooks, REST API and MCP
- Pro: No subscription: one-time credit packs, with 100 free credits to start
- Pro: Leads arrive deduplicated and enriched with email, and phone on request
- Pro: White-label delivery for data resellers and agencies
Weaknesses
- Con: No native Zapier or Clay connector; those go through webhooks or the API
- Con: Credit-based pricing means the monthly cost varies with lead volume
- Con: Social engagement signals need tight persona filters to stay relevant
- Con: Web app and API only, no mobile app
Key features
Plans and prices: Apollo.io vs Rodz
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo.io |
| apollo.io/pricing read Oct 14, 2026 |
| Rodz |
| rodz.io/en/pricing read Oct 12, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Apollo.io pricing and Rodz pricing.
Key Takeaways
Apollo.io
- Choose if you want find leads, enrich contacts, automate outreach, and track engagement
Rodz
- Choose if you want turn 46 real-time buying signals into enriched, deduplicated B2B leads
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Only Apollo.io has a published user rating (4.1/5 from 11,273 reviews); Rodz has none we can show.
- Apollo.io starts at $49/seat/mo, billed yearly; Rodz has no public paid plan price on file.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Apollo.io and Rodz compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only Apollo.io has a published user rating (4.1/5 from 11,273 reviews); Rodz has none we can show. Apollo.io starts at $49/seat/mo, billed yearly; Rodz has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.
What are Apollo.io and Rodz used for?
Apollo.io: Find leads, enrich contacts, automate outreach, and track engagement. Rodz: Turn 46 real-time buying signals into enriched, deduplicated B2B leads.
What does Apollo.io cost vs Rodz?
Apollo.io's cheapest paid plan is Basic at $49/seat/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Rodz has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 14, 2026.
What's the main difference between Apollo.io and Rodz?
Apollo.io's main strength: massive B2B contact database with 275M+ contacts. Rodz's main strength: 46 signal types in one tool, from fundraisings and M&A to job changes and LinkedIn engagement.