ApplicantStack vs Workforce.com: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for ApplicantStack and Workforce.com side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
ApplicantStack
Find, hire, and onboard new employees with a simple, fast, and powerful HR software.
Best for you if:
- • You want comprehensive solution covering both recruiting and onboarding
Workforce.com
All-in-one workforce management for hourly employees, covering scheduling, HR, and payroll.
Best for you if:
- • You want eliminates double data entry across scheduling, HR, and payroll
| At a Glance | ApplicantStack | |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $29.99/mo, billed monthly Starter plan | Not published |
Category | HR & Recruiting ATS | HR & Recruiting Time Tracking |
Rating | 4.4/5 Capterra 4.4 · G2 4.4 · TrustRadius 4.6 2,373 reviews | 4.6/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.7 174 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Watch out for | Additional admin/hiring manager seats cost extra on higher tiers. | n/a |
Choose ApplicantStack or Workforce.com?
Choose ApplicantStack if
- You want comprehensive solution covering both recruiting and onboarding
- You want highly customizable workflows to fit specific hiring processes
Choose Workforce.com if
- You want eliminates double data entry across scheduling, HR, and payroll
- You want automates complex pay rate calculations and ensures compliance
In-Depth Analysis
ApplicantStack
Find, hire, and onboard new employees with a simple, fast, and powerful HR software.
ApplicantStack offers a fair pricing structure, especially for smaller businesses with limited hiring needs.
Watch out
Additional admin/hiring manager seats cost extra on higher tiers.
Strengths
- Pro: Comprehensive solution covering both recruiting and onboarding
- Pro: Highly customizable workflows to fit specific hiring processes
- Pro: Integrated text messaging for improved candidate communication and engagement
- Pro: User-friendly interface, making it easy to adopt
- Pro: Strong customer support with HR experience
Weaknesses
- Con: Specific details on advanced analytics capabilities are not explicitly detailed
- Con: No mention of direct integrations with payroll systems or other HRIS beyond its own onboarding module
- Con: The extent of customization for the employee portal is not fully specified
Key features
Workforce.com
All-in-one workforce management for hourly employees, covering scheduling, HR, and payroll.
Strengths
- Pro: Eliminates double data entry across scheduling, HR, and payroll.
- Pro: Automates complex pay rate calculations and ensures compliance.
- Pro: Provides tools for performance management and employee engagement.
- Pro: Designed specifically for the complexities of hourly workforces.
- Pro: Offers significant ROI through reduced labor costs and increased efficiency.
Weaknesses
- Con: Pricing is not transparent and requires a quote.
- Con: May be overly comprehensive for very small businesses with simple needs.
Key features
Plans and prices: ApplicantStack vs Workforce.com
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ApplicantStack |
| applicantstack.com/pricing read Oct 8, 2026 |
| Workforce.com |
| workforce.com/pricing read Oct 8, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on ApplicantStack pricing and Workforce.com pricing.
Key Takeaways
ApplicantStack
- Choose if you want find, hire, and onboard new employees with a simple, fast, and powerful HR software
Workforce.com
- Choose if you want all-in-one workforce management for hourly employees, covering scheduling, HR, and payroll
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.4/5 from 2,373 reviews for ApplicantStack, 4.6/5 from 174 reviews for Workforce.com).
- ApplicantStack starts at $29.99/mo, billed monthly; Workforce.com has no public paid plan price on file.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do ApplicantStack and Workforce.com compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.4/5 from 2,373 reviews for ApplicantStack, 4.6/5 from 174 reviews for Workforce.com). ApplicantStack starts at $29.99/mo, billed monthly; Workforce.com has no public paid plan price on file.
What are ApplicantStack and Workforce.com used for?
ApplicantStack: Find, hire, and onboard new employees with a simple, fast, and powerful HR software. Workforce.com: All-in-one workforce management for hourly employees, covering scheduling, HR, and payroll.
What does ApplicantStack cost vs Workforce.com?
ApplicantStack's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $29.99/mo, billed monthly. Workforce.com has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 8, 2026.
What's the main difference between ApplicantStack and Workforce.com?
ApplicantStack's main strength: comprehensive solution covering both recruiting and onboarding. Workforce.com's main strength: eliminates double data entry across scheduling, HR, and payroll.