Automox vs Gardience: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Automox and Gardience side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Automox
Automate IT operations and secure every endpoint across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Best for you if:
- • You want to automate IT operations and secure every endpoint across Windows, macOS, and Linux
Gardience
Manage Windows and Linux with supported Salt, Ansible, patching, and compliance
Best for you if:
- • Teams running Salt (or leaving Tanzu Salt or SUSE Multi-Linux Manager) that manage both Windows and Linux servers and want supported, flat-p
| At a Glance | Automox | Gardience |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $1/mo, billed monthly PatchOS plan | From $6,000/year Starter plan |
Category | Cloud & Infrastructure Security | DevOps Infrastructure as Code |
Rating | 4.6/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.7 475 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | No | No |
Choose Automox or Gardience?
Choose Automox if
- You want to automate IT operations and secure every endpoint across Windows, macOS, and Linux
Choose Gardience if
- Teams running Salt (or leaving Tanzu Salt or SUSE Multi-Linux Manager) that manage both Windows and Linux servers and want supported, flat-p
- You want to manage Windows and Linux with supported Salt, Ansible, patching, and compliance
In-Depth Analysis
Automox
Automate IT operations and secure every endpoint across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Automox's pricing structure starts very affordably with PatchOS at $1 per endpoint/month, making it highly competitive for basic patching needs.
Strengths
- Pro: Significant time savings and increased efficiency in patching and security operations.
- Pro: Cloud-native platform eliminates the need for VPNs or on-prem servers.
- Pro: Comprehensive coverage for Windows, macOS, Linux, and a wide range of third-party applications.
- Pro: "Turnkey Results" program provides personalized guidance and ensures successful implementation.
- Pro: Strong security features including SSO, MFA, RBAC, and multiple certifications (SOC 2, GDPR, PCI-DSS).
Weaknesses
- Con: Pricing is per endpoint, which may scale for very large organizations.
- Con: Advanced features and modules like Automox Resolve are add-ons or part of higher tiers.
- Con: Requires an agent to be installed on each endpoint.
Key features
Gardience
Manage Windows and Linux with supported Salt, Ansible, patching, and compliance
Strengths
- Pro: Windows and Linux managed from one console, at the same price per fleet
- Pro: Flat yearly price per fleet, not per machine, core or user
- Pro: Runs existing Ansible playbooks, including on Windows without WinRM
- Pro: Works with an existing Salt master, or installs its own with one command
- Pro: Every change goes through approvals and lands in a tamper-evident audit log
Weaknesses
- Con: Self-hosted only, SaaS in production: you run it on your own Linux server with Docker
- Con: Patching, CVE checks and compliance cover Windows and Linux, servers and desktops. macOS can run the Salt agent for commands and states, but Gardience does not patch or score it yet. Laptops off the n
- Con: A product, with fewer third-party integrations (ServiceNow, Slack approvals) than older suites
Key features
Plans and prices: Automox vs Gardience
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Automox |
| automox.com/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
| Gardience |
| gardience.com/pricing read Oct 23, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Automox pricing and Gardience pricing.
Key Takeaways
Automox
- Choose Automox if you want to automate IT operations and secure every endpoint across Windows, macOS, and Linux
Gardience
- Choose Gardience if you want to manage Windows and Linux with supported Salt, Ansible, patching, and compliance
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Only Automox has a published user rating (4.6/5 from 475 reviews); Gardience has none we can show.
- Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Automox $1/mo, billed monthly; Gardience $6,000/year.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Automox and Gardience compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only Automox has a published user rating (4.6/5 from 475 reviews); Gardience has none we can show. Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Automox $1/mo, billed monthly; Gardience $6,000/year.
What are Automox and Gardience used for?
Automox: Automate IT operations and secure every endpoint across Windows, macOS, and Linux. Gardience: Manage Windows and Linux with supported Salt, Ansible, patching, and compliance.
What does Automox cost vs Gardience?
Automox's cheapest paid plan is PatchOS at $1/mo, billed monthly. Gardience's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $6,000/year. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between Automox and Gardience?
Automox's main strength: significant time savings and increased efficiency in patching and security operations. Gardience's main strength: windows and Linux managed from one console, at the same price per fleet.
Spotted an outdated price or a wrong fact? Suggest a correction: we check it against the vendor's own page. Work for one of these vendors? Claim your listing to update it yourself.