Baseten vs RunInfra: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Baseten and RunInfra side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Baseten leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Baseten
Deploy and scale ML models with fast cold starts and dedicated GPUs
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
RunInfra
Serve open models to agents with one API for OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs
Best for you if:
- • You want high cache-hit rates reduce effective input costs for repeated agent context
| At a Glance | Baseten | RunInfra |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan | From $10/mo, billed monthly Starter plan |
Category | AI Model Deployment Hosting & Deployment | AI Model Deployment |
Rating | 4.0/5 G2 4.0 7 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | No |
Watch out for | n/a | $5 minimum top-up on Pay as you go |
Choose Baseten or RunInfra?
Choose Baseten if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want easy model deployment
- You want auto-scaling
Choose RunInfra if
- You want high cache-hit rates reduce effective input costs for repeated agent context
- You want single API key works across OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs, simplifying integration
In-Depth Analysis
Baseten
Deploy and scale ML models with fast cold starts and dedicated GPUs
Baseten's freemium model with a generous Basic tier offering dedicated deployments and fast cold starts for $0 is highly competitive and fair.
Strengths
- Pro: Easy model deployment
- Pro: Auto-scaling
- Pro: Good for inference
- Pro: Model marketplace
- Pro: Quick setup
Weaknesses
- Con: Expensive at scale
- Con: Limited customization
- Con: Vendor lock-in
- Con: Support varies
- Con: Smaller community
Key features
RunInfra
Serve open models to agents with one API for OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs
The pricing is fair for teams needing consistent inference for coding agents, with the $10/mo Starter offering a low entry point for light usage.
Watch out
$5 minimum top-up on Pay as you go
Strengths
- Pro: High cache-hit rates reduce effective input costs for repeated agent context
- Pro: Single API key works across OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs, simplifying integration
- Pro: Offers both pay-as-you-go credits and monthly coding plans to fit different usage patterns
Weaknesses
- Con: Cache hits are best effort rather than guaranteed
- Con: Self-serve pay-as-you-go tier has no contractual SLA
Key features
Plans and prices: Baseten vs RunInfra
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Baseten |
| baseten.co/pricing read Sep 28, 2026 |
| RunInfra |
| runinfra.ai/pricing read Oct 27, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Baseten pricing and RunInfra pricing.
Key Takeaways
Baseten
- Has a free plan
RunInfra
- Choose if you want serve open models to agents with one API for OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs
What the data shows
On the data below, Baseten leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Baseten has a published user rating (4.0/5 from 7 reviews); RunInfra has none we can show.
- RunInfra starts at $10/mo, billed monthly; Baseten has no public paid plan price on file.
- Only Baseten has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Baseten and RunInfra compare in 2026?
On the data below, Baseten leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Baseten has a published user rating (4.0/5 from 7 reviews); RunInfra has none we can show. RunInfra starts at $10/mo, billed monthly; Baseten has no public paid plan price on file. Only Baseten has a free plan.
What are Baseten and RunInfra used for?
Baseten: Deploy and scale ML models with fast cold starts and dedicated GPUs. RunInfra: Serve open models to agents with one API for OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs.
What does Baseten cost vs RunInfra?
Baseten has no public paid-plan price on file. RunInfra's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $10/mo, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 27, 2026.
What's the main difference between Baseten and RunInfra?
Baseten's main strength: easy model deployment. RunInfra's main strength: high cache-hit rates reduce effective input costs for repeated agent context.