Skip to content

Contentful vs Siteleaf: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)

Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Contentful and Siteleaf side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.

On the data: On the data below, Contentful leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.

Data comparison compiled by Toolradar, not hand-reviewed Methodology
Data comparison 409 user reviews compared Pricing checked Oct 7, 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:

Contentful

Manage and deliver digital content across all channels via APIs

Best for you if:

  • • You want a free tier before you commit

Siteleaf

A friendly CMS for static sites, empowering content creators and developers alike.

Best for you if:

  • • You want a tool that combines developer-friendly tools with an easy-to-use content editor for non-technical users
At a glance: Contentful vs Siteleaf
At a Glance
Contentful Contentful
Siteleaf Siteleaf
Starts at
Free plan, paid from €300/mo, billed monthly Lite plan
Not published
Category
Headless CMS Writing & Content
CMS Writing & Content
Rating
4.4/5 G2 4.3 · Capterra 4.5 409 reviews n/a
Free plan
Yes No
Watch out for
The Free-to-Lite jump is €0 to €300/month with no intermediate tier. Many startups outgrow Free (25 content types, 2 locales, 2 environments) within months but struggle to justify €3,600/year for a CMS alone. n/a

Choose Contentful or Siteleaf?

Contentful

Choose Contentful if

  • You want a free tier before you commit
  • You want to manage and deliver digital content across all channels via APIs
Siteleaf

Choose Siteleaf if

  • You want a tool that combines developer-friendly tools with an easy-to-use content editor for non-technical users

In-Depth Analysis

Contentful Contentful

Manage and deliver digital content across all channels via APIs

Fair value

Contentful is the market-leading headless CMS, and its pricing reflects that position.

Watch out

The Free-to-Lite jump is €0 to €300/month with no intermediate tier. Many startups outgrow Free (25 content types, 2 locales, 2 environments) within months but struggle to justify €3,600/year for a CMS alone.

Strengths

  • Pro: Flexible content model
  • Pro: Great API
  • Pro: Strong ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • Con: Can be expensive
  • Con: Learning curve

Key features

Headless CMS REST & GraphQL APIs Content modeling Localization Media management Webhooks

Siteleaf Siteleaf

A friendly CMS for static sites, empowering content creators and developers alike.

Strengths

  • Pro: Combines developer-friendly tools with an easy-to-use content editor for non-technical users.
  • Pro: Strong GitHub integration provides version control, collaboration, and a 'time machine' for content.
  • Pro: Supports various publishing destinations, offering flexibility and avoiding vendor lock-in.
  • Pro: Promotes fast, secure, and portable static websites.
  • Pro: Offers a free tier for developers and open source projects.

Weaknesses

  • Con: No built-in hosting, requiring users to manage their own hosting solution.
  • Con: While Jekyll compatible, users might need some understanding of Jekyll for advanced customization.
  • Con: Legacy v1 plans have limitations compared to v2 plans.

Key features

Jekyll compatibility and open source ecosystem integration Cloud-based content editor for non-technical users GitHub integration for version control and theme syncing User roles (Admin, Publisher, Writer) for team collaboration Live preview of changes before publishing Smart text editor with Markdown and visual editing options

Plans and prices: Contentful vs Siteleaf

Plans and prices of Contentful and Siteleaf, as read on each vendor's pricing page. Each plan keeps its own billing unit.
Tool Plans and prices Source
Contentful
  • Free: Free
  • Lite: €300/mo, billed monthly
  • Premium: Custom pricing
contentful.com/pricing read Oct 2, 2026
Siteleaf
  • Developer: Custom pricing
  • Personal: Custom pricing
  • Team: Custom pricing
  • Business: Custom pricing
siteleaf.com/plans read Oct 7, 2026

Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Contentful pricing and Siteleaf pricing.

Key Takeaways

Contentful

  • Has a free plan

Siteleaf

  • Worth considering for CMS

What the data shows

On the data below, Contentful leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.

  • Only Contentful has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 409 reviews); Siteleaf has none we can show.
  • Contentful starts at €300/mo, billed monthly; Siteleaf has no public paid plan price on file.
  • Only Contentful has a free plan.

Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate

Frequently Asked Questions

How do Contentful and Siteleaf compare in 2026?

On the data below, Contentful leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Contentful has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 409 reviews); Siteleaf has none we can show. Contentful starts at €300/mo, billed monthly; Siteleaf has no public paid plan price on file. Only Contentful has a free plan.

What are Contentful and Siteleaf used for?

Contentful: Manage and deliver digital content across all channels via APIs. Siteleaf: A friendly CMS for static sites, empowering content creators and developers alike.

What does Contentful cost vs Siteleaf?

Contentful's cheapest paid plan is Lite at €300/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Siteleaf has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 7, 2026.

What's the main difference between Contentful and Siteleaf?

Contentful's main strength: flexible content model. Siteleaf's main strength: combines developer-friendly tools with an easy-to-use content editor for non-technical users.

Spotted an outdated price or a wrong fact? Suggest a correction: we check it against the vendor's own page. Work for one of these vendors? Claim your listing to update it yourself.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools